Image access restricted
Terracotta portrait bust of a man from Cumae: view from back right

Image access restricted
Terracotta portrait bust of a man from Cumae: three-quarter view from left

Image access restricted
Terracotta portrait bust of a man from Cumae: right profile view

Image access restricted
Terracotta portrait bust of a man from Cumae: three-quarter view from right

Image access restricted
Terracotta portrait bust of a man from Cumae: view from the right

Image access restricted
Terracotta portrait bust of a man from Cumae: left profile view

Collection: Museum of Fine Arts, Boston
Title: Terracotta portrait of a man
Context: Possibly from Cumae
Findspot: Found near Cumae, to the NW of the Bay of Naples, ca. 1895.
Summary: Bust of an older man
Object Function: Unknown
Material: Terracotta
Sculpture Type: Free-standing portrait bust
Category: Single monument
Style: Late Republican
Technique: In-the-round
Original or Copy: Original
Date: ca. 50 BC
Dimensions: H. 0.357 m; L. (face) 0.18 m
Scale: Life-size
Region: Campania
Period: Late Republican


Subject Description: Portrait of an older man, his head turned slightly to the right, with facial wrinkles and sagging flesh, especially around the throat. A small wart is visible under the inside of the left eye. The subject has a sober expression, with the corners of his mouth turned downwards, and slightly furrowed brows. While the nationality of the man is unknown, most scholars assume that he is an Italian. Vermeule introduces the theory that the man may have been Greek, since he lacks the severely veristic style of other portraits of Roman men made during the same period (Vermeule 37-38).

Form & Style: Schweitzer refers to the style of this portrait as "painterly-pathetic" (quoted in Hiesinger 811). Vermeule describes the portrait as having both veristic and ideal qualigies (Vermeule 37). The bust has also been grouped with the Delian portraits by Stewart, suggesting that it may have been imported to Cumae (Stewart 1979, 93 n. 39). Strong observes that this terracotta portrait lies somewhere between the wax imagines and portraits created specifically to be viewed as objects of art (Strong 106). As Hiesinger explains, this bust may have served as a bozetto or model for a portrait that would have been copied at a later time into a more durable and labor intensive material, such as marble or other hard stone (Hiesinger 816). The bust, therefore, probably served as a study for a subsequent work.

Condition: Head only (complete)

Condition Description: The bust is complete and intact, with the exception of a small chunk missing from the nape of the neck. There is a small hole at the base of the neck on the right side, which appears to have been made when the work was produced. The terracotta shows evidence of weathering, as indicated by the gray surface.

Material Description: Grayish-orange terracotta

Technique Description: The facial features are very well defined, while the hair appears to have been loosely sculpted, perhaps by the sculptor's finger-tips. This suggests that the portrait was made from a life mask. Vermeule suggests a likely method by which the mask was made. Wet plaster would have been laid on the subject's face, while the subject was supine, in repose. A straw would have been inserted into the left nostril for breathing, as explained by Vermeule (28): "the right nostril is pressed against the cartilage of the nose, while the left is puffed or flared out." The subject would then remain very still while the plaster hardened, in order for the plaster to capture every line, wrinkle, and facial flaw. When completed, the mask would have been attached to the remaining part of the bust. It is evident that the eyebrows were defined by hand, and the pupils incised. The other details of the portrait, including the ears and hair, would also have been molded by hand. This would serve as a plausible explanation as to why the subject's hair and back of head appears to have been given less attention than the facial features.

Sources Used: Stewart 1979; Vermeule 1978; Hiesinger 1973; Strong 1970,

Other Bibliography: R.R.R. Smith 1981, 30; Breckenridge 1968, 8, fig. 2; Hanfmann 1967, 335, pl. 280; Schoeder 1965, 11, pl. 85; Fairbanks 1963, 124, pl. 16b, 173, fig. 206;Lawrence 1929, 315; Chase 1924, 173, fig. 206; Hekler 1912, xxviii, pls. 144-45; von Mach 1905, xxviii, pls. 436-37.