Statistics for occurrence #1 of “Lunt” in chapter 21 of Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 13.:

...o its confederates, is undoubtedly a sin of a deep dye. Has not Massachusetts done both recently in the late contest? For proof we offer Lunt and the incomparable book which we are now reviewing. Lunt says the South undoubtedly supposed that slavery was guaranteed to it by the Constitution, and would not have entered into the Union but for the supposition. Massachusetts was anxious for the Union...

Don't like any of these choices? Suggest a new possibility...

Max. Freq. Min. Freq.
Entity Corpus Doc Corpus Doc  
Lunt 50 12 0 0 0 user votes
George Lunt 80 0 4 0 0 user votes
Alphonso M. Lunt 14 0 0 0 0 user votes
Richard K. Lunt 10 0 0 0 0 user votes
William H. Lunt 10 0 0 0 0 user votes
Samuel H. Lunt 6 0 0 0 0 user votes
Thomas P. Lunt 6 0 0 0 0 user votes
Albert W. Lunt 4 0 0 0 0 user votes
Henry Lunt 4 0 0 0 0 user votes
W. P. Lunt 4 0 0 0 0 user votes
William Parsons Lunt 4 0 2 0 0 user votes
Nina J. Lunt 3 0 1 0 0 user votes
A. D. C. Lunt 2 0 0 0 0 user votes
Francis C. Lunt 2 0 0 0 0 user votes
H. C. Lunt 2 0 0 0 0 user votes
J. B. Lunt 2 0 0 0 0 user votes
Lucretia Watson Lunt 2 0 0 0 0 user votes
Paul G. Lunt 2 0 0 0 0 user votes
W. O. Lunt 2 0 0 0 0 user votes
William W. Lunt 2 0 0 0 0 user votes
William P. Lunt 1 0 1 0 0 user votes

† This entity has been selected by the automated classifier as the most likely match in this context. It may or may not be the correct match.