hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Lucius R. Paige, History of Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1630-1877, with a genealogical register 254 254 Browse Search
Harper's Encyclopedia of United States History (ed. Benson Lossing) 42 42 Browse Search
George Bancroft, History of the Colonization of the United States, Vol. 1, 17th edition. 15 15 Browse Search
HISTORY OF THE TOWN OF MEDFORD, Middlesex County, Massachusetts, FROM ITS FIRST SETTLEMENT, IN 1630, TO THE PRESENT TIME, 1855. (ed. Charles Brooks) 14 14 Browse Search
The Cambridge of eighteen hundred and ninety-six: a picture of the city and its industries fifty years after its incorporation (ed. Arthur Gilman) 11 11 Browse Search
Benjamin Cutter, William R. Cutter, History of the town of Arlington, Massachusetts, ormerly the second precinct in Cambridge, or District of Menotomy, afterward the town of West Cambridge. 1635-1879 with a genealogical register of the inhabitants of the precinct. 5 5 Browse Search
Knight's Mechanical Encyclopedia (ed. Knight) 5 5 Browse Search
Charles A. Nelson , A. M., Waltham, past, present and its industries, with an historical sketch of Watertown from its settlement in 1630 to the incorporation of Waltham, January 15, 1739. 5 5 Browse Search
George Bancroft, History of the United States from the Discovery of the American Continent, Vol. 3, 15th edition. 3 3 Browse Search
Thomas Wentworth Higginson, Harvard Memorial Biographies 3 3 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in George Bancroft, History of the Colonization of the United States, Vol. 1, 17th edition.. You can also browse the collection for 1635 AD or search for 1635 AD in all documents.

Your search returned 15 results in 4 document sections:

oted hostility, his appointment could not but be unpopular. The colony had esteemed it a special favor from King 1630 to 1635. James, that, upon the substitution of the royal authority for the corporate supremacy, the government had been intrusted ary,ibid.153—177. 1632, Septemberibid.178—202. 1633, February,ibid.202—209. 1633, August,ibid.209—222. 1634,ibid.223. 1635,ibid.223. 1636,ibid.229. 1637,ibid.227. 1639,ibid.229—230. 1640,Hening, i.268. 1641, June,ibid.259—262. 1642, Januar, at their own charge, Hening, 175, Acts 57 and 58. and gave to their statutes the greatest possi- Chap. VI.} 1630 to 1635. ble publicity. Ibid. 177, Act 68. When the defects and inconveniences of infant legislation were remedied by a revisedfter the dissolution of the company, furnishes a tissue of inventions. Keith, 143, 144, places in 1639 the occurrences of 1635. His book is superficial. The commissioners appointed by the council to man- 1636 age the impeachment of Harvey
erce with the Indians was earnestly pursued under the sanction of the colonial government. Relation of Maryland, 4; ed. 1635. Smith's History of Virginia, II. 63 and 95. An attempt was made to obtain a monopoly of this commerce Rel. of Maryland, 1635, p. 10. by William Clayborne, whose resolute and enterprising spirit was destined to exert a powerful Chap VII.} 1621 and long-continued influence. His first appearance in America was as a surveyor, Hening, i. 116. sent by the Londofound in Hazard, i. 327—337; in Bacon's Laws of Maryland at Large. It is appended in English to the Relation of Maryland, 1635. It has been commented upon by Chalmers, 202—205; very diffusely by McMahon, 133—183; by Story, i 92—94; and many others.and were eventually the sad consequences of the revolution in England. Twelve months had not elapsed before the colony 1635. Feb. of Maryland, in February, 1635, was convened for legislation. Probably all the freemen were present in a strictly
. Williamson, i.237, and ff. Gorges, 48, 49. Yet a pride of character sustained in Gorges an 1635 Feb. 3. unbending hope; and he clung to the project of territorial aggrandizement. When Mason li the discretion of the executive, the people next demanded a written constitution; and a commis- 1635 May sion was appointed to frame a body of grounds of laws in resemblance to a magna charta, to se reduced to the form of a law, at Providence, in 1647, in II. Mass. Hist. Coll VII. 96. when he 1635 Mar. 30. was summoned before the court, he could not renounce his belief; and his influence was sart to have abandoned them; and the instinct of liberty led him again to the sugges- Chap. IX.} 1635. tion of a proper remedy. In conjunction with the church, he wrote letters of admonition unto alenerally stirred to come over. New settlements were, therefore, formed. A little band, toiling 1635. through thickets of ragged bushes, and clambering over crossed trees, made its way along Indian
res. Poor as the new settlements were, six hundred pounds were raised towards fortifications; the assistants and the deputies discovered their minds to one another, and the fortifications were hastened. All the ministers assembled at Boston; it 1635 Jan. 19. marks the age, that their opinions were consulted; it marks the age still more, that they unanimously declared against the reception of a general governor. We ought, said the fathers in Israel, to defend our lawful possessions, if we areights of the adjoining colony, suspended the hostile movements, Winthrop, i. 187. which Gorges had too much honesty and too little intrigue to renew. Winthrop, II. 12. Hazard, i. 403. The severe censures in the Star Chamber, the great- 1635 to 1637 ness of the fines which avarice rivaled bigotry in imposing, the rigorous proceedings with regard to ceremonies, the suspending and silencing of multitudes of ministers, still continued; and men were enforced by heaps to desert their nativ