polite and well-bred people of the South regarding the most patent details of the Southern President's career.
In one of his piquante and meaty addresses Hon. Champ Clark, of Missouri, paralleled the manner in which noted Northerners and Southerners were treated in the histories, cyclopedias and biographical dictionaries of thant and well-equipped Missourian was exceptionally correct; but his deduction from it seems scarcely tenable: that the disproportion was the fault of the North.
Mr. Clark left an important factor out of his calculation: that the histories and fact books have almost invariably been left to Northern men to write; that they, naturall pumpkin pies, would insist upon offering them imported plum pudding.
But the South had her skilled cooks, and plums for their cooking galore.
Should not Congressman Clark lay the blame at our own proper door?
We boast, and with good show of justice, that we have scholars, writers and teachers in the South unexcelled on the pl