hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies, Chapter XXII: Operations in Kentucky, Tennessee, North Mississippi, North Alabama, and Southwest Virginia. March 4-June 10, 1862., Part II: Correspondence, Orders, and Returns. (ed. Lieut. Col. Robert N. Scott) 152 0 Browse Search
Col. John M. Harrell, Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 10.2, Arkansas (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 94 0 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 19. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 90 0 Browse Search
Colonel Charles E. Hooker, Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 12.2, Mississippi (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 86 0 Browse Search
Robert Underwood Johnson, Clarence Clough Buell, Battles and Leaders of the Civil War: Volume 2. 76 0 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 2. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 70 0 Browse Search
Edward Alfred Pollard, The lost cause; a new Southern history of the War of the Confederates ... Drawn from official sources and approved by the most distinguished Confederate leaders. 62 0 Browse Search
Robert Underwood Johnson, Clarence Clough Buell, Battles and Leaders of the Civil War: The Opening Battles. Volume 1. 60 0 Browse Search
Benson J. Lossing, Pictorial Field Book of the Civil War. Volume 2. 58 0 Browse Search
Col. John C. Moore, Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 9.2, Missouri (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 56 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in Col. John M. Harrell, Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 10.2, Arkansas (ed. Clement Anselm Evans). You can also browse the collection for Earl Van Dorn or search for Earl Van Dorn in all documents.

Your search returned 47 results in 8 document sections:

ruary 6th, General McCulloch was commanded by Van Dorn to order two regiments of infantry, two of ca Grand total of the division, 10,485. General Van Dorn was at Pocahontas when, February 23d, he prings, Ark., where it would be joined by General Van Dorn and the Indian forces of Gen. Albert Pikeh of March, without waiting for General Pike, Van Dorn moved out for Bentonville, where Sigel, with marked by burning depots and forage piles. Van Dorn says in his report: Owing to bad roads and de had completely shielded by earthworks. As Van Dorn well knew, to attack the enemy's line from th enemy from the ground he had occupied by General Van Dorn's orders, my command again charged the enurage unsurpassed. Our latest order from General Van Dorn directed our line to retire by the Huntsvnemy during the action. March 9, 1862, General Van Dorn requested of General Curtis that, accordiville, Tenn., that General Beauregard desired Van Dorn to join his forces with those of Beauregard o[19 more...]
under Canby. Meanwhile the command of General Van Dorn had been moved east of the Mississippi, bal Johnston. The Arkansas troops reported by Van Dorn in his organization, at Memphis, Tenn., Aprilna who might come into the State to report to Van Dorn. Any infantry troops that might be in the Stof troops transferred, of the first sent with Van Dorn's command, arrived at Corinth in time to take to the President, describing the havoc which Van Dorn had caused already, and that which he contempn called for them when he did not need them. Van Dorn gathered men from all quarters, until they we Curtis by disloyal informers. The news that Van Dorn had arrived with 30,000 men, told by a citizeration of martial aw in orders of Beauregard, Van Dorn, Hebert, Pike, Bragg, and by himself in Tenneengaged in his White river operations. General Van Dorn, in his letter of June 9th to President Dcommand? General Pike doubtless thought that Van Dorn and Hindman were to be held responsible for t[8 more...]
ruary 6th, General McCulloch was commanded by Van Dorn to order two regiments of infantry, two of ca the time being. The appointment of Major-General Van Dorn to the command of the Trans-Mississippis and Sigel, and the battle of Sugar Creek. Van Dorn immediately sent McCulloch orders to form a j had completely shielded by earthworks. As Van Dorn well knew, to attack the enemy's line from thut this time I received instructions from General Van Dorn to the effect that General Price was abouurage unsurpassed. Our latest order from General Van Dorn directed our line to retire by the Huntsvnemy during the action. March 9, 1862, General Van Dorn requested of General Curtis that, accordide, 2,902. On the 18th of March, 1862, General Van Dorn reported that the entire army he had marcville, Tenn., that General Beauregard desired Van Dorn to join his forces with those of Beauregard ooast, were ordered to him. March 19th, General Van Dorn ordered Col. T. J. Churchill, with his br[19 more...]
under Canby. Meanwhile the command of General Van Dorn had been moved east of the Mississippi, bal Johnston. The Arkansas troops reported by Van Dorn in his organization, at Memphis, Tenn., Aprilrry's) battalion; Provence's battery. General Van Dorn had recommended for promotion to the rankdays cooked rations. On his departure, General Van Dorn, having tendered to Gen. J. S. Roane a brof troops transferred, of the first sent with Van Dorn's command, arrived at Corinth in time to take to the President, describing the havoc which Van Dorn had caused already, and that which he contempn called for them when he did not need them. Van Dorn gathered men from all quarters, until they wend munitions in transitu for the Indians, General Van Dorn, June 9, 1862, wrote a letter from Pricev Curtis by disloyal informers. The news that Van Dorn had arrived with 30,000 men, told by a citized and captured. In the latter part of May, Van Dorn had ordered Brigadier-General Rust to report [8 more...]
Capture of Lexington Price and McCulloch Van Dorn in command Federal advance under Curtis bath of March, without waiting for General Pike, Van Dorn moved out for Bentonville, where Sigel, with orn tavern, before 2 o'clock, it was evident, Van Dorn reported afterward, that if McCulloch could aut this time I received instructions from General Van Dorn to the effect that General Price was abou enemy from the ground he had occupied by General Van Dorn's orders, my command again charged the en3d, General Pike had received dispatches from Van Dorn's adjutant-general directing him to hasten winemy during the action. March 9, 1862, General Van Dorn requested of General Curtis that, accordivage warfare. To this note Col. D. H. Maury, Van Dorn's adjutant-general, made an immediate reply, llows: General: I am instructed by Major-General Van Dorn, commanding this district, to express Mississippi river, if possible. To this General Van Dorn replied, March 16th, that he would unite [19 more...]
under Canby. Meanwhile the command of General Van Dorn had been moved east of the Mississippi, bal Johnston. The Arkansas troops reported by Van Dorn in his organization, at Memphis, Tenn., Aprilna who might come into the State to report to Van Dorn. Any infantry troops that might be in the Stn called for them when he did not need them. Van Dorn gathered men from all quarters, until they wethe people's property and safety displayed by Van Dorn's operations. He protested against the furthnd munitions in transitu for the Indians, General Van Dorn, June 9, 1862, wrote a letter from Pricevd and captured. In the latter part of May, Van Dorn had ordered Brigadier-General Rust to report ration of martial aw in orders of Beauregard, Van Dorn, Hebert, Pike, Bragg, and by himself in Tennend everything necessary for my troops. General Van Dorn, in March, took from me, at Fort Smith ancommand? General Pike doubtless thought that Van Dorn and Hindman were to be held responsible for t[8 more...]
Capture of Lexington Price and McCulloch Van Dorn in command Federal advance under Curtis bat, 1862, with headquarters at Little Rock, General Van Dorn assumed command of the district, which co the time being. The appointment of Major-General Van Dorn to the command of the Trans-Mississipp had completely shielded by earthworks. As Van Dorn well knew, to attack the enemy's line from thurage unsurpassed. Our latest order from General Van Dorn directed our line to retire by the Huntsvul results. In his report of the battle, General Van Dorn indited the following manly, feeling, andvage warfare. To this note Col. D. H. Maury, Van Dorn's adjutant-general, made an immediate reply, de, 2,902. On the 18th of March, 1862, General Van Dorn reported that the entire army he had marc. A heavy blow had been struck the Federals; Van Dorn proposed to seek another field before they ret. Louis. Gov. Isham G. Harris had written Van Dorn, March 7th, from Clarksville, Tenn., that Gen[19 more...]
al Johnston. The Arkansas troops reported by Van Dorn in his organization, at Memphis, Tenn., Aprilrry's) battalion; Provence's battery. General Van Dorn had recommended for promotion to the rankof troops transferred, of the first sent with Van Dorn's command, arrived at Corinth in time to take to the President, describing the havoc which Van Dorn had caused already, and that which he contempn called for them when he did not need them. Van Dorn gathered men from all quarters, until they we Curtis by disloyal informers. The news that Van Dorn had arrived with 30,000 men, told by a citizeDavis, put in command of unattached forces by Van Dorn, and given a brigade in the army of the West.ration of martial aw in orders of Beauregard, Van Dorn, Hebert, Pike, Bragg, and by himself in Tennend everything necessary for my troops. General Van Dorn, in March, took from me, at Fort Smith ancommand? General Pike doubtless thought that Van Dorn and Hindman were to be held responsible for t[8 more...]