ct how great was the work, and that men were worthy it should be addressed to them? Papers on literature and Art, p. 173.
In this conversation, as in all the imaginary conversations which were so in fashion at that period, there are traces of Landor; but Margaret Fuller achieved, both in Aglauron and Laurie, and in The two Herberts, what Landor rarely accomplished — what Lowell could not achieve in his Conversations on the Dramatists, or her other fellow-townsman, Story, in his more recent HLandor rarely accomplished — what Lowell could not achieve in his Conversations on the Dramatists, or her other fellow-townsman, Story, in his more recent He and she, --the distinct individualization of the two participants.
Through the whole dialogue we see two persons, not merely one person speaking through two mouths.
For instance, Laurie asks Aglauron:--
But have I not seemed heartless to you at times? and Aglauron replies:--
In the moment, perhaps, but quiet thought always showed me the difference between heartlessness and the want of a deep heart. Here we have not only an admirable glimpse into the recesses of human character, bu
ct how great was the work, and that men were worthy it should be addressed to them? Papers on literature and Art, p. 173.
In this conversation, as in all the imaginary conversations which were so in fashion at that period, there are traces of Landor; but Margaret Fuller achieved, both in Aglauron and Laurie, and in The two Herberts, what Landor rarely accomplished — what Lowell could not achieve in his Conversations on the Dramatists, or her other fellow-townsman, Story, in his more recent HLandor rarely accomplished — what Lowell could not achieve in his Conversations on the Dramatists, or her other fellow-townsman, Story, in his more recent He and she, --the distinct individualization of the two participants.
Through the whole dialogue we see two persons, not merely one person speaking through two mouths.
For instance, Laurie asks Aglauron:--
But have I not seemed heartless to you at times? and Aglauron replies:--
In the moment, perhaps, but quiet thought always showed me the difference between heartlessness and the want of a deep heart. Here we have not only an admirable glimpse into the recesses of human character, bu
ct how great was the work, and that men were worthy it should be addressed to them? Papers on literature and Art, p. 173.
In this conversation, as in all the imaginary conversations which were so in fashion at that period, there are traces of Landor; but Margaret Fuller achieved, both in Aglauron and Laurie, and in The two Herberts, what Landor rarely accomplished — what Lowell could not achieve in his Conversations on the Dramatists, or her other fellow-townsman, Story, in his more recent HLandor rarely accomplished — what Lowell could not achieve in his Conversations on the Dramatists, or her other fellow-townsman, Story, in his more recent He and she, --the distinct individualization of the two participants.
Through the whole dialogue we see two persons, not merely one person speaking through two mouths.
For instance, Laurie asks Aglauron:--
But have I not seemed heartless to you at times? and Aglauron replies:--
In the moment, perhaps, but quiet thought always showed me the difference between heartlessness and the want of a deep heart. Here we have not only an admirable glimpse into the recesses of human character, bu
ct how great was the work, and that men were worthy it should be addressed to them? Papers on literature and Art, p. 173.
In this conversation, as in all the imaginary conversations which were so in fashion at that period, there are traces of Landor; but Margaret Fuller achieved, both in Aglauron and Laurie, and in The two Herberts, what Landor rarely accomplished — what Lowell could not achieve in his Conversations on the Dramatists, or her other fellow-townsman, Story, in his more recent HLandor rarely accomplished — what Lowell could not achieve in his Conversations on the Dramatists, or her other fellow-townsman, Story, in his more recent He and she, --the distinct individualization of the two participants.
Through the whole dialogue we see two persons, not merely one person speaking through two mouths.
For instance, Laurie asks Aglauron:--
But have I not seemed heartless to you at times? and Aglauron replies:--
In the moment, perhaps, but quiet thought always showed me the difference between heartlessness and the want of a deep heart. Here we have not only an admirable glimpse into the recesses of human character, bu