hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Harper's Encyclopedia of United States History (ed. Benson Lossing) 6,437 1 Browse Search
Richard Hakluyt, The Principal Navigations, Voyages, Traffiques, and Discoveries of the English Nation 1,858 0 Browse Search
Knight's Mechanical Encyclopedia (ed. Knight) 766 0 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Documents and Narratives, Volume 1. (ed. Frank Moore) 310 0 Browse Search
Admiral David D. Porter, The Naval History of the Civil War. 302 0 Browse Search
Raphael Semmes, Memoirs of Service Afloat During the War Between the States 300 0 Browse Search
Hon. J. L. M. Curry , LL.D., William Robertson Garrett , A. M. , Ph.D., Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 1.1, Legal Justification of the South in secession, The South as a factor in the territorial expansion of the United States (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 266 0 Browse Search
Henry Morton Stanley, Dorothy Stanley, The Autobiography of Sir Henry Morton Stanley 224 0 Browse Search
George Bancroft, History of the United States from the Discovery of the American Continent, Vol. 5, 13th edition. 222 0 Browse Search
Horace Greeley, The American Conflict: A History of the Great Rebellion in the United States of America, 1860-65: its Causes, Incidents, and Results: Intended to exhibit especially its moral and political phases with the drift and progress of American opinion respecting human slavery from 1776 to the close of the War for the Union. Volume I. 214 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: December 12, 1861., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for England (United Kingdom) or search for England (United Kingdom) in all documents.

Your search returned 5 results in 3 document sections:

The Daily Dispatch: December 12, 1861., [Electronic resource], Successors of Messrs. Mason and Slidell. (search)
lently and illegally taken. In that event, they can proceed on their voyage and execute their mission. It is not only possible, but, in the opinion of many competent judges, it is probable that the British Government will insist upon at least that degree of reparation to the insulted dignity of the British flag. If such a demand be made, we believe that the Yankee Government would accede to it at once, for, with all their prodigious boasting, they will never dare to provoke a war with Great Britain. At all events, till that question is determined, it is at least due to our commissioned representatives to make no new appointments, a proceeding which, moreover, would expose us to the embarrassment of having, in the event of their release, two sets of Commissioners to England and France. But supposing it definitely determined that the British Government will not interfere in their behalf, it is questionable policy whether other gentlemen should be sent from this country to take thei
Majesty, the Queen of Spain, and the Emperor of the French, Relative to combined operations against Mexico. Her Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, her Majesty the Queen of Spain, and his Majesty the Emperor of the French, feeling themselves compelled, by the arbitrary and vexatious conduct of combine their common action, and for this purpose, have named as their Plenipotentiaries, that is to say: Her Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, the Right Hon. John Earl Russell, Viscount Amberly, of Amberly and Ardsalla, a Peer of the United Kingdom, a member of her Britannic Majesty's Prieir respective full powers, found in good and due form, have agreed upon the following articles: Article 1. Her Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, her Majesty the Queen of Spain, and his Majesty the Emperor of the French, engage to make, immediately after the signature of the present conventi
ns Bee. We do not recollect to have noticed the very significant passages from the Times and Post, which we retranslate from the Bee: [from the Bee] "Something is passing in European politics, which, in as much as we have no access to European journals, and can, therefore, base our opinion only upon a few brief extracts from English journals, is to us incomprehensible. There are three European powers who are deeply interested in the progress of events in this country. These are Great Britain, France, and Spain. The joint expedition projected against Mexico appeared to be the first step in the direction of a direct intervention in the affairs of North America. But after indicating the terms of the triple alliance, the telegraph apprised us at the last moment that England had declined signing it, and that Spain, determined to act on her own responsibility, was about to undertake the adventure single-handed, while the two other Governments in question would confine their co-o