nless ample guarantees were accorded them that Kansas should thenceforth be regarded and treated as ged that the question of Freedom or Slavery in Kansas should be submitted to a direct popular vote, nnsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Virginia, Kansas-13.
Mr. Seddon's project, excluding that pving his colleagues live to five. Indiana, and Kansas were equally divided, and so cast no vote.
Ths adopted by the following vote — New York and Kansas not voting, because equally divided:
Ays--as carried, by the following vote-New York and Kansas still equally divided:
Ays--Connecticut, Dennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Vermont, Kansas-16.
Noes-Iowa, Maine,Massachusetts, North C, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Kansas-11.
Noes--Connecticut, Indiana, Iowa, Maine, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Kansas-12.
Noes-Connecticut, Iowa, Maine, Missouriucky, Missouri, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas.
They have approved what is herewith submit
The mercantile aristocracy of St. Louis was predominantly devoted to their supposed interests and docile to their commands.
But for St. Louis on one side and Kansas on the other, Missouri could scarcely have been saved.
But Kansas had a population whom the rough experiences of previous years had educated into deadly hostilitKansas had a population whom the rough experiences of previous years had educated into deadly hostility to the Slave Power; while St. Louis possessed, in her liberty-loving Germans, in her intelligent and uncompromising citizens of eastern lineage, and in The St. Louis Democrat--a journal of high character and extensive influence, which could neither be bought nor frightened into recreancy to the interests of Free Labor — the elemlay County, in the midst of a strongly pro-Slavery population.
As it had been often robbed with impunity to arm the Border Ruffians for their repeated raids into Kansas, it was naturally supposed that it might now be drawn upon for its entire contents in behalf of what was essentially the same cause.
Accordingly, on the 20th, it
or lately one of the United States.
Mr. J. H. Lane, of Kansas, moved to amend this, by adding,
Unless a military nec Messrs. Sherman, of Ohio, Browning, of Illinois, Lane, of Kansas, Fessenden, of Maine, etc., on the other, took part.
Mr. is, Howe, Johnson, of Tenn., King, Lane, of Ind., Lane, of Kansas, McDougall, Morrill, Pomeroy, Sherman, Sumner, Ten Eyck, Wan, of Ohio.
I do not under-stand either the Senator from Kansas on my right, or the Senator from Connecticut, or the Senator from Kansas behind me, to say that it is the purpose of this war to abolish Slavery.
It is not waged for any such purpos Johnson, of Tenn., Kennedy, King, Lane, of Ind., Lane, of Kansas, Latham, Morrill, Nesmith, Pomeroy, Saulsbury, Sherman, Teoster, Grimes, Hale, Harris, King, Lane, of Ind., Lane, of Kansas, McDougall, Sherman, Simmons, Sumner, Ten Eyck, Trumbull, oster, Grimes, Harris, Howe, King, Lane, of Ind., Lane, of Kansas, McDougall, Morrill, Rice, Sherman, Sumner, Ten Eyck, Trum