Your search returned 29 results in 15 document sections:
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events, Diary from December 17, 1860 - April 30, 1864 (ed. Frank Moore),
Waitt, Ernest Linden, History of the Nineteenth regiment, Massachusetts volunteer infantry , 1861-1865, Roster of the
Nineteenth regiment Massachusetts Volunteers (search)
Cambridge History of American Literature: volume 3 (ed. Trent, William Peterfield, 1862-1939., Erskine, John, 1879-1951., Sherman, Stuart Pratt, 1881-1926., Van Doren, Carl, 1885-1950.), Book
III (continued) (search)
Cambridge History of American Literature: volume 3 (ed. Trent, William Peterfield, 1862-1939., Erskine, John, 1879-1951., Sherman, Stuart Pratt, 1881-1926., Van Doren, Carl, 1885-1950.), Index (search)
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 25. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), chapter 1.32 (search)
The Daily Dispatch: December 11, 1861., [Electronic resource], Important from
C. S. District Court. --The argument in the case of the Confederate States vs. Wolff and Stern, to sequestrate certain debts due by them to Elkers and Balkner, was continued yesterday by Mr. Guastaves A. Myers for the defendants, and will be resumed to-day. In the case of Isaac Williams and others vs. the sloop Betsy Richards, in Admiralty, the Marshal made his report, and paid into Court the amount realized from the sale of the vessel, &c. Jas. E. Watson qualified as an attorney to practice in this Court.
The Daily Dispatch: January 11, 1862., [Electronic resource], The
expedition — warm work Expected in Burnside North Carolina--the weather — cistern water scarce, &c. (search)
C. S. District Court. --In this Court, yesterday, orders of sale were entered in the cases of the Confederate States against John Predmore, O. E. Malthy, and M. R. Watkinson, for the sequestration of property. Judge Halyburton delivered an elaborate opinion in the case of the Confederate States against Wolff and Stern, to sequestrate the property of Elkers, which is noticed more fully in another department of this paper. Daniel B. Lucas qualified to practice as an attorney in this Court.
The Daily Dispatch: January 11, 1862., [Electronic resource], From
Interesting decision under the Sequestratration act. The case of the Confederate States against Wolff et als., to sequestrate certain debts due them to Elkers & Brother, alleged to be allen enemies, was called up yesterday the Confederate States District Court, rd Judge Halyburton delivered his opinion thereupon, indicating his purpose to dismiss the petition. The particulars of this novel case are as follows: Isaac Elkers. A native of Prussia, emigrated to this country many years ago, resided in Mobile, Ala., for a long period, where he took out his last naturalization papers in 1849. He established a large clothing store in Mobile in conjunction with his brother, and afterwards, in 1853, removed to New York and there established a branch house of trade. He married in New York, bought a residence there, and voted there at the Presidential election of --voting against Lincoln. He frequently visited Mobile from 1851 to 1861, and continued a partner in the Mobile house.
C. S. District Court. --On Saturday the District Attorney entered a noole prosequi in the case of Chas. Patz, the individual charged with stealing blank Confederate Treasury notes. In the case of C. S. A. us. Wolff and Stern, to effect the property of George and Simon Elkers, the Judge dismissed the petition filed against them, thereby virtually proclaiming the loyally of the parties sought to be effected. In the case of the C. S. A. against Chapman J. Leigh, to effect the property of C. M. Fry & Co., the report of Commissioner Watson was returned and filed. The latter is understood to be adverse to the claims of defendand, Leigh, who is a native and now a citizen of Richmond.