hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Matching Documents
The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.
Browsing named entities in M. Tullius Cicero, Orations, for his house, Plancius, Sextius, Coelius, Milo, Ligarius, etc. (ed. C. D. Yonge). You can also browse the collection for Puteoli (Italy) or search for Puteoli (Italy) in all documents.
Your search returned 7 results in 5 document sections:
M. Tullius Cicero, For Plancius (ed. C. D. Yonge), chapter 26 (search)
M. Tullius Cicero, For Plancius (ed. C. D. Yonge), chapter 27 (search)
On this, I, angry and disgusted, said, “No; from Sicily.” And then, some one
else, with the air of a man who knew everything, said, “What! do
not you know that Cicero has been quaestor at Syracuse?” I need not make
a long story of it; I gave over being angry, and was content to be
considered one of those who had come to Puteoli for the waters.
But I do not know, O judges, whether what happened then did not do me more
good than if every one had congratulated me. For after I learnt from this
that the people of Rome had deaf
ears, but very sharp and active eyes, I gave up thinking what men would have
said of me; but took care that they should every day see me in their
presence: I lived in their sight; I stuck to the forum; neither my porter
M. Tullius Cicero, Against Vatinius (ed. C. D. Yonge), chapter 5 (search)
M. Tullius Cicero, For Marcus Caelius (ed. C. D. Yonge), chapter 2 (search)
M. Tullius Cicero, For Marcus Caelius (ed. C. D. Yonge), chapter 10 (search)
Therefore, I willingly allow that part of the cause to be concluded, summed
up, as it has been, with dignity and elegance by Marcus Crassus; the part, I
mean, which relates to the seditions at Naples, to the expulsion of the Alexandrians from
Puteoli, and to the
property of Palla. I wish he had also discussed the transaction respecting
Dio. And yet on that subject what is there that you can expect me to say, when the man who committed the murder is not afraid, but
even confesses it? For he is a king. But the man who is said to have been
the assistant and accomplice in the murder, has been acquitted by a regular
trial. What sort of crime, then, is this, that the man who has committed it
does not deny it—that he who has denied it has been acquitted, and