hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Harper's Encyclopedia of United States History (ed. Benson Lossing) 874 98 Browse Search
Benson J. Lossing, Pictorial Field Book of the Civil War. Volume 1. 411 1 Browse Search
Frederick H. Dyer, Compendium of the War of the Rebellion: Regimental Histories 353 235 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 29. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 353 11 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events, Diary from December 17, 1860 - April 30, 1864 (ed. Frank Moore) 345 53 Browse Search
William Schouler, A history of Massachusetts in the Civil War: Volume 1 321 3 Browse Search
Benjamnin F. Butler, Butler's Book: Autobiography and Personal Reminiscences of Major-General Benjamin Butler 282 2 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Documents and Narratives, Volume 1. (ed. Frank Moore) 253 1 Browse Search
Allan Pinkerton, The spy in the rebellion; being a true history of the spy system of the United States Army during the late rebellion, revealing many secrets of the war hitherto not made public, compiled from official reports prepared for President Lincoln , General McClellan and the Provost-Marshal-General . 242 0 Browse Search
Horace Greeley, The American Conflict: A History of the Great Rebellion in the United States of America, 1860-65: its Causes, Incidents, and Results: Intended to exhibit especially its moral and political phases with the drift and progress of American opinion respecting human slavery from 1776 to the close of the War for the Union. Volume I. 198 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in Jefferson Davis, The Rise and Fall of the Confederate Government. You can also browse the collection for Baltimore, Md. (Maryland, United States) or search for Baltimore, Md. (Maryland, United States) in all documents.

Your search returned 32 results in 5 document sections:

the Republican convention of 1860, its resolutions and its nominations the Democratic convention at Charleston, its divisions and disruption the nominations at Baltimore the Constitutional-Union party and its nominees an effort in behalf of agreement declined by Douglas the election of Lincoln and Hamlin proceedings in the Sot with regard to the declaration of principles to be set forth rendered a nomination impracticable. Both divisions of the convention adjourned, and met again in Baltimore in June. Then, having finally failed to come to an agreement, they separated and made their respective nominations apart. Douglas of Illinois was nominated by denounced the action and policy of the Abolition party, as subversive of the Constitution, and revolutionary in their tendency. Another convention was held in Baltimore about the same period May 19, 1860. by those who still adhered to the old Whig party, reinforced by the remains of the American organization, and perhaps som
s palpable violation of the Constitution action of Virginia of citizens of Baltimore the charge of precipitation against South Carolina action of the Confederatia passed her ordinance of secession, and two days thereafter the citizens of Baltimore resisted the passage of troops through that city on their way to make war upoas soon to ensue. The manly effort of the unorganized, unarmed citizens of Baltimore to resist the progress of armies for the invasion of her Southern sisters, wa executive authorities that no more troops should be sent through the city of Baltimore; this promise, however, was observed only until, by artifice, power had been at Harpers Ferry. Referring to an application that had been made to him from Baltimore, I wrote: Sustain Baltimore if practicable. We will reenforce you. The univBaltimore if practicable. We will reenforce you. The universal feeling was that of a common cause and common destiny. There was no selfish desire to linger around home, no narrow purpose to separate local interests from t
lamation arrival of Massachusetts troops at Baltimore passage through the city disputed activityng a few and wounding many. The police of Baltimore were very active in their efforts to preventnderstood, by orders from the authorities of Baltimore. On April 20th President Lincoln wrote inbut I make no point of bringing them through Baltimore. On the next day, the 21st, Mayor Brown and the public by the mayor after his return to Baltimore. From that report I make the following extrought through Maryland without going through Baltimore, etc. . . . The interview terminated with tht, that no more troops would be sent through Baltimore, unless obstructed in their transit in othere month, he moved a portion of the troops to Baltimore, and took position on Federal Hill —thus was consummated the military occupation of Baltimore. On the next day, reenforcements were received;nger necessity to regard the remonstrance of Baltimore against sending troops through the city, and[8 more...]
out of place, and therefore addressed to him the following letter: Richmond, Virginia, October 30, 1861. General Beauregard, Manassas, Virginia. sir: Yesterday my attention was called to various newspaper publications purporting to have been sent from Manassas, and to be a synopsis of your report of the battle of the 21st of July last, and in which it is represented that you have been overruled by me in your plan for a battle with the enemy south of the Potomac for the capture of Baltimore and Washington, and the liberation of Maryland. I inquired for your long-expected report, and it has been today submitted to my inspection. It appears, by official endorsement, to have been received by the Adjutant-General on the 18th of October, though it is dated August 26, 1861. With much surprise I found that the newspaper statements were sustained by the text of your report. I was surprised, because, if we did differ in opinion as to the measure and purposes of contemplated ca
Peace Congress, 214. Brooklyn navy yard. Site ceded to Federal government by New York, 179. Brown, Mayor of Baltimore, 288. Extract from report of conference with Lincoln, 289. Brown, John, 27,36, 70. Brown, Joseph E., Letter dmund, 107. Burlamagui, —, 120, 121. Burt, Colonel, 376, 377. Butler, Gen. B. F. Occupation of Federal Hill in Baltimore, 289. C Cabell, Gen. W. L., 303, 329-30. Cabot, George, 8, 60, 61, 63. Calhoun, John C., 115, 131, 429. Dd, 42, 108. Instructions to delegates to Constitutional convention, 80. Ratification of Constitution, 93. Citizens of Baltimore resist passage of Federal troops, 259, 288. Position at beginning of war, 287-88. Commissioners sent to Confederate and U. S. governments, 289. Seizure of Baltimore by Federal troops, 289-91. Action of Gen. Banks against, 291-92. Extract from final message of governor to legislature, 292. Mason, Seizure from British ship by U. S. officers, 402. George. Op