Browsing named entities in Hon. J. L. M. Curry , LL.D., William Robertson Garrett , A. M. , Ph.D., Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 1.1, Legal Justification of the South in secession, The South as a factor in the territorial expansion of the United States (ed. Clement Anselm Evans). You can also browse the collection for Massachusetts (Massachusetts, United States) or search for Massachusetts (Massachusetts, United States) in all documents.

Your search returned 53 results in 4 document sections:

Hon. J. L. M. Curry , LL.D., William Robertson Garrett , A. M. , Ph.D., Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 1.1, Legal Justification of the South in secession, The South as a factor in the territorial expansion of the United States (ed. Clement Anselm Evans), Legal justification of the South in secession. (search)
numeration of popular rights, not a compact between States, but was recognized in its fullest demands, when, in 1782, Great Britain acknowledged New Hampshire, Massachusetts, New York, South Carolina, Georgia and the other colonies to be free, sovereign and independent States. Stress is laid on the revolutionary government and opoint of fact the Constitution did become obligatory as a compact of government by the voluntary and separate ratification and adoption of the several states. Massachusetts and New Hampshire, in their ratification, call the Constitution a compact, and the federal Union must be so, or the result of a compact, because sovereign Statrovisions to prevent were incorporated in the acts of assent. The right to resume surrendered powers, as affirmed by three of the States, has been mentioned. Massachusetts, South Carolina, New Hampshire and Virginia were so alarmed at the liability to absorption of unsurrendered powers, that they proposed an amendment to the effe
Hon. J. L. M. Curry , LL.D., William Robertson Garrett , A. M. , Ph.D., Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 1.1, Legal Justification of the South in secession, The South as a factor in the territorial expansion of the United States (ed. Clement Anselm Evans), The South as a factor in the territorial expansion of the United States. (search)
, the Carolinas, Virginia, Connecticut and Massachusetts, the claim of Virginia alone extending to es C. Pinckney.John Jay. New Hampshire66 Massachusetts1616 Rhode Island431 Connecticut99 Vermo.John LangdonRufus King. New Hampshire77 Massachusetts1919 Rhode Island44 Connecticut99 Vermonnators Horsey of Delaware and Pickering of Massachusetts. It was found to involve questions connecdebate on this bill that Josiah Quincy, of Massachusetts, in words of eloquence and fire, gave ventre; Lloyd, of Massachusetts; Pickering, of Massachusetts, and Reed, of Maryland. (Annals of Congre Gerry.Jared Ingersoll. New Hampshire817 Massachusetts22220 Rhode Island44 Connecticut99 Vermo33 Kentucky1212 Louisiana33 Maryland88 Massachusetts2222 New Hampshire88 New Jersey88 New Yo the unanimous vote of these States, viz., Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Virginia, the admission of the Southern applicant. Massachusetts had already assented to the separation, an[22 more...]
Hon. J. L. M. Curry , LL.D., William Robertson Garrett , A. M. , Ph.D., Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 1.1, Legal Justification of the South in secession, The South as a factor in the territorial expansion of the United States (ed. Clement Anselm Evans), The civil history of the Confederate States (search)
nies experimented with this form of labor, Massachusetts beginning in 1638 and South Carolina thirtl question certainly did have influence in Massachusetts and to some extent in other States; but thas legal everywhere in the Union except in Massachusetts, because at that time it bore some profit or twenty years until 1808: New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Maryland, North Carolina, Soman. That man was the august Senator from Massachusetts—Daniel Webster. Upon his speech, and, as M Union, endeavoring to bring the people of Massachusetts. We dissolve the Union under the impulse associates, and the great war Governor of Massachusetts recommended in his message no concessions f the Federal government by Eli Thayer, of Massachusetts, during the year. It consisted of a propo conduct of the war. Governor Andrews, of Massachusetts, had begun earnestly to demand the privileatesmen. Mr. Cox, of Ohio, Mr. Thomas, of Massachusetts, Mr. Richardson, of Illinois, and many oth[7 more...]
Hon. J. L. M. Curry , LL.D., William Robertson Garrett , A. M. , Ph.D., Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 1.1, Legal Justification of the South in secession, The South as a factor in the territorial expansion of the United States (ed. Clement Anselm Evans), Biographical: officers of civil and military organizations. (search)
orting to Mr. Davis at Montgomery, was at once entrusted with the important duty of visiting the North to purchase war material and engage mechanics for the manufacture of ordnance machinery, ammunition, etc. On this tour he inspected the Virginia State arsenal and Tredegar iron works with a view to their use for military purposes, witnessed the inauguration of Mr. Lincoln, examined the machinery of the Washington arsenal, and visited the principal work shops in New York, Connecticut and Massachusetts. He purchased percussion caps at New York, had thousands of pounds of powder shipped South, and made contracts for artillery and machinery. With a nice sense of honor he never afterward betrayed the names of the thrifty Northerners who thus contributed to the military needs of the South. He was then commissioned commander and put in charge of the lighthouse bureau, and two weeks later was sent to New Orleans to fit out the cruiser Sumter, with which he cut through the river blockade a