hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Harper's Encyclopedia of United States History (ed. Benson Lossing) 1,078 0 Browse Search
Frederick H. Dyer, Compendium of the War of the Rebellion: Regimental Histories 442 0 Browse Search
Brig.-Gen. Bradley T. Johnson, Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 2.1, Maryland (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 440 0 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Documents and Narratives, Volume 1. (ed. Frank Moore) 430 0 Browse Search
Benson J. Lossing, Pictorial Field Book of the Civil War. Volume 1. 330 0 Browse Search
Horace Greeley, The American Conflict: A History of the Great Rebellion in the United States of America, 1860-65: its Causes, Incidents, and Results: Intended to exhibit especially its moral and political phases with the drift and progress of American opinion respecting human slavery from 1776 to the close of the War for the Union. Volume I. 324 0 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events, Diary from December 17, 1860 - April 30, 1864 (ed. Frank Moore) 306 0 Browse Search
Hon. J. L. M. Curry , LL.D., William Robertson Garrett , A. M. , Ph.D., Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 1.1, Legal Justification of the South in secession, The South as a factor in the territorial expansion of the United States (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 284 0 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 29. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 254 0 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Poetry and Incidents., Volume 5. (ed. Frank Moore) 150 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in George Bancroft, History of the United States from the Discovery of the American Continent, Vol. 2, 17th edition.. You can also browse the collection for Maryland (Maryland, United States) or search for Maryland (Maryland, United States) in all documents.

Your search returned 55 results in 7 document sections:

ale of their products the colonists were equally injured. The English, being the sole purchasers, could obtain those products at a little less than their fair value. The merchant of Bristol or London was made richer; the planter of Virginia or Maryland was made poorer. No new value was created; one lost what the other gained; and both parties had equal claims to the benevolence of the legislature. Burke. Thus the colonists were wronged, both in their purchases and in their sales; the lpart from the public offices in Rhode Island. I am especially indebted to William R. Staples, who, with singular liberality, intrusted to me the Ms. Collections which he has been gathering for years. Such kindness demands my gratitude. For Maryland, the restoration of the Stuarts was the restoration of its proprietary. Virginia possessed far stronger claims for favor than Rhode Island and Con- 1661. April 30. necticut; and Sir William Berkeley himself embarked for England as the agent of
which had been retained in the days of Charles I. and of Cromwell, and which was renewed under Charles II., Compare Carolina, by T. A 1682, p. 3. continued to be encouraged by similar giants. Clayborne, Hening, i. 377. the early trader in Maryland, 1652 still cherished a fondness for discovery; and the sons of Governor Yeardley Thurloe, II. 273, 274. Letter of Francis Yeardley to John Farrar. wrote to England with exultation, that the northern country of Carolina had been explored by Dalcho, 13. Hewat, i. 53 Thus the institution of negro slavery is coeval with the first plantations on Ashley River. Of the original thirteen states, South Carolina alone was from its cradle essentially a planting state with slave labor. In Maryland, in Virginia, the custom of employing indented servants long prevailed; and the class of white laborers was always numerous; for no where in the United States is the climate more favor- Chap. XIII.} able to the Anglo-Saxon laborer than in Virg
s rebellion, with the corresponding scenes in Maryland, and Carolina, and New England, was the earlynes of carnage and civil war, the progress of Maryland, under the more generous proprietary governme placed beyond their control. Macculloch's Maryland, 155, &c As in Virginia, the party of the proree from stain. The commercial metropolis of Maryland commemorates his name; the memory of his wisennulled the rule which the representatives of Maryland had established respecting the elective francon the death of the first feudal sovereign of Maryland, the powerful influence of 1676. the archbisuality. Misrepresentations were not spared. Maryland, said a clergyman of the church, is a pest-hobeen disregarded; the custom-house officer of Maryland had been placed under the superintendence of ntroversy with Virginia. Communicated from Maryland Records. The accession of James ii. seemed a will right our people according to justice. Maryland and Virginia had repeatedly negotiated with t[18 more...]
, three years, therefore, before the concession of the charter for Maryland, Samuel Godyn and Samuel Blommaert, both directors of the Amsterdah of absolute obedience to all their past or future commands. But Maryland was free; Virginia governed itself. The restless colonists, almohe ocean. They were proud of its vast extent, from New England to Maryland, from the sea to the Great River of Canada, and the remote north-wshould not avail the Dutch. Heerman's Journal of his embassy to Maryland, in reply to Col. N. Utie, &c., in Albany Records, XVIII. 337—365. Compare also VIII 185. So too Maryland Papers, in N. Y. Hist. Coll. III. 369—386. On the restoration, Lord Baltimore renewed his claims toord Baltimore was denied with pertinacity. In 1672, the people of Maryland, desiring to stretch the boundary of their province to the bay, in escaped the Chap. XV.} 1664. imminent peril of being absorbed in Maryland. In respect to civil liberties, the territory shared the for tu
f government analogous to those of the charter for Maryland. That no clause might be at variance with EnglisI.} 1682 at peace with the Algonquins; the laws of Maryland refer to Indian hostilities and massacres, which euke of York had always urged, that the charter for Maryland included only lands that were still unoccupied; thested; the voyages of De Vries, and the records of Maryland and of New York, establish its validity. But whatnsylvania had been a representative democracy. In Maryland, the council was named by Lord Baltimore; in Pennsylvania, by the people. In Maryland, the power of appointing magistrates, and all, even the subordinate execu derived from the export of tobacco, the staple of Maryland; and his colony was burdened with taxes: a similarthe tract of Delaware did not constitute a part of Maryland. The proper boundaries of the territory remained 761, commissioners began to designate the limit of Maryland on the side of Pennsylvania and Delaware. In 1763
to the Saint Croix, extended continuously to Connecticut River, and was bounded on the south by Maryland. We have now to trace an attempt to consolidate the whole coast north of the Delaware. The s have kept the chain entire. The covenant must be preserved; the fire of love of Virginia and Maryland, and of the Five Nations, burns in this place: this house of peace must be kept clean. We planchem; and we are a small people. When the English came first to Manhattan, to Virginia, and to Maryland, they were a small people, and we were great. Because we found you a good people, we treated yement winter. Not long after the first excursion to the east, the July. whole seaboard from Maryland to the St. Croix was united in one extensive despotism. The entire dominion, of which Boston, ial government, as established by James II., fell with Andros. We have already seen 1689 that Maryland had also perfected a revolution, in which Protestant intolerance, as well as popular liberty, h
e days are half the time notoriously false; as the statements of Randolph. The account in Humphrey much underrates Virginia. New York, not less than twenty thousand; New Jersey, half as many; Pennsylvania and Del-aware, perhaps twelve thousand; Maryland, twentyfive thousand; Virginia, fifty thousand, or more; and the two Carolinas, which then included the soil of Georgia, probably not less than eight thousand souls. The emigration of the fathers of these twelve commonwealths, with the plantiiny, and yet adapted with exact harmony to the outward world; at once divine and humane,—this system was professed in every part of our widely-extended country, and cradled our freedom. Our fathers were not only Christians; they were, even in Maryland by a vast majority, elsewhere almost unanimously, Protestants. Now the Protestant reformation, considered in its largest influence on politics, was the common people awakening to freedom of mind. During the decline of the Roman empire, the o