hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Sorting
You can sort these results in two ways:
- By entity
- Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
- By position
- As the entities appear in the document.
You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.
hide
Most Frequent Entities
The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.
Entity | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
C. J. Stuart | 28 | 0 | Browse | Search |
W. S. Anderson | 26 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Henry A. Wise | 25 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Augusta (Georgia, United States) | 24 | 0 | Browse | Search |
William Ballard Preston | 21 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Samuel D. Denoon | 20 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Robert E. Scott | 19 | 1 | Browse | Search |
George K. Crutchfield | 18 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Abraham Lincoln | 18 | 0 | Browse | Search |
O. Harvie | 16 | 0 | Browse | Search |
View all entities in this document... |
Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: April 9, 1861., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.
Found 2 total hits in 2 results.
Erben Irvin (search for this): article 10
Dealing in lead.
--Erben Irvin was inducted in the presence of the Mayor yesterday, charged with having unlawfully possessed himself of a keg of white lead belonging to Wm. Satler & Co. The article usually sold at ten cents per pound, and was disposed of by him for half the amount, on the principle of lightly come — lightly go. The Mayor did not recognize the validity of the transaction in any of its aspects, and therefore sent the defendant to jail to be indicted by the Grand Jury.
William Satler (search for this): article 10
Dealing in lead.
--Erben Irvin was inducted in the presence of the Mayor yesterday, charged with having unlawfully possessed himself of a keg of white lead belonging to Wm. Satler & Co. The article usually sold at ten cents per pound, and was disposed of by him for half the amount, on the principle of lightly come — lightly go. The Mayor did not recognize the validity of the transaction in any of its aspects, and therefore sent the defendant to jail to be indicted by the Grand Jury.