hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
The Daily Dispatch: March 30, 1865., [Electronic resource] 4 0 Browse Search
George Bancroft, History of the United States from the Discovery of the American Continent, Vol. 2, 17th edition. 4 0 Browse Search
George P. Rowell and Company's American Newspaper Directory containing accurate lists of all the newspapers and periodicals published in the United States and territories, and the dominion of Canada, and British Colonies of North America, together with a description of the towns and cities in which they are published: description of towns and cities. (ed. George P. Rowell and company) 2 0 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 35. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 2 0 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 32. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 2 0 Browse Search
Elias Nason, McClellan's Own Story: the war for the union, the soldiers who fought it, the civilians who directed it, and his relations to them. 2 0 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Poetry and Incidents., Volume 3. (ed. Frank Moore) 2 0 Browse Search
G. S. Hillard, Life and Campaigns of George B. McClellan, Major-General , U. S. Army 2 0 Browse Search
Benson J. Lossing, Pictorial Field Book of the Civil War. Volume 3. 2 0 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 4. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 2 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: July 23, 1861., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for Raleigh or search for Raleigh in all documents.

Your search returned 1 result in 1 document section:

The Daily Dispatch: July 23, 1861., [Electronic resource], The Stay law in North Carolina. (search)
The Stay law in North Carolina. --The Wilmington Journal states, on the authority of a private letter from Raleigh, that the Supreme Court of North Carolina, on the 5th inst, decided the Stay Law of that State to be null and void, as being opposed alike to that prevision of the Constitution of the United and Confederate States, which says, that no State shall pass an ex post facto law, or a law impairing the obligations of contracts.