hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 48 0 Browse Search
John Tyler 18 0 Browse Search
William Patrick 17 1 Browse Search
James Johnson 16 0 Browse Search
L. Polk 15 1 Browse Search
October 21st 14 14 Browse Search
Lord Lyons 13 1 Browse Search
J. M. Price 12 0 Browse Search
William H. Seward 11 1 Browse Search
U. S. Grant 10 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: October 29, 1861., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 99 total hits in 17 results.

1 2
United States (United States) (search for this): article 6
itannic Majesty near the Government of the United States, and Mr. Secretary Seward, representing LiGovernment, the Secretary of State for the United States examines, upon the reports of spies, and athe field and besieging the Capital of the United States. A portion of this correspondence, which rtner, Smith, is a disloyal citizen of the United States, and that be was in Europe when the treasoby an order of the Secretary of War of the United States addressed to the police of the city of Newuld thereafter bear true allegiance to the United States, and do no act hostile or injurious to theintercourse between the Governments of the United States and Great Britain, it should be necessary ident, proceedings of the President of the United States. Certainly it is not necessary to annon the contrary, that the President of the United States is, by the Constitution and laws, investedef of all the land and naval forces of the United States. Although it is not very important, it ce[5 more...]
New York (New York, United States) (search for this): article 6
. A portion of this correspondence, which was intercepted, was addressed to the firm of Smith & Patrick, brokers, long established and doing business in the city of New York. It appeared that this firm had a branch at Mobile, that the partner, Smith, is a disloyal citizen of the United States, and that be was in Europe when the ck was arrested and committed into military custody at Fort Lafayette by an order of the Secretary of War of the United States addressed to the police of the city of New York. These proceedings took place on the 28th of August last. Representations were thereupon made to the Secretary of State by friends on the part of Mr. P of the Secretary of State.--This release occurred on the 13th day of September last. On the second day of September the Superintendent of Police in the city of New York informed the Secretary of State, by telegraph, that he had under arrest J. C. Rahming, who had just arrived from Nassau, where he had attempted to induce the
Nassau River (Florida, United States) (search for this): article 6
r agent to inquire into the correctness of the facts thus presented and this inquiry resulted in the establishment of their truth. Mr. William Patrick was thereupon promptly released from custody by direction of the Secretary of State.--This release occurred on the 13th day of September last. On the second day of September the Superintendent of Police in the city of New York informed the Secretary of State, by telegraph, that he had under arrest J. C. Rahming, who had just arrived from Nassau, where he had attempted to induce the owners of the schr. Arctic to take cannon to Wilmington, in North Carolina, for the use of the rebels, and inquired what he should do with the prisoner. J. C. Rahming was thereupon committed into military custody at Fort Lafayette, under a mandate from the Secretary of State. This commitment was made on the 2d day of September. On the 17th of that month this prisoner, after due inquiry, was released from custody on his executing a bond in the penalty o
England (United Kingdom) (search for this): article 6
ecretary of State. This commitment was made on the 2d day of September. On the 17th of that month this prisoner, after due inquiry, was released from custody on his executing a bond in the penalty of $2,500, with a condition that he should thereafter bear true allegiance to the United States, and do no act hostile or injurious to them while remaining under their protection. I have to regret that, after so long an official intercourse between the Governments of the United States and Great Britain, it should be necessary now to inform her Majesty's Ministers that all executive proceedings, whether of the Secretary of War or of the Secretary of State, are, unless disavowed or revoked by the President, proceedings of the President of the United States. Certainly it is not necessary to announce to the British Government now that an insurrection, attended by civil and even social war, was existing in the United States when the proceedings which I have thus related took place. Bu
Alabama (Alabama, United States) (search for this): article 6
e that upon these grounds her Majesty's Government have felt bound to instruct you to remonstrate against such irregular proceedings, and to say that, in their opinion, the authority of Congress is necessary in order to justify the arbitrary arrest and imprisonment of British subjects. The facts in regard to the two persons named in your note are as follows: Communications from the regular police of the country to the Executive at Washington showed that disloyal persons in the State of Alabama were conducting treasonable correspondence with Confederates, British subjects, and American citizens, in Europe, aimed at the overthrow of the Federal Union by armed forces actually in the field and besieging the Capital of the United States. A portion of this correspondence, which was intercepted, was addressed to the firm of Smith & Patrick, brokers, long established and doing business in the city of New York. It appeared that this firm had a branch at Mobile, that the partner, Smi
Wilmington, N. C. (North Carolina, United States) (search for this): article 6
stablishment of their truth. Mr. William Patrick was thereupon promptly released from custody by direction of the Secretary of State.--This release occurred on the 13th day of September last. On the second day of September the Superintendent of Police in the city of New York informed the Secretary of State, by telegraph, that he had under arrest J. C. Rahming, who had just arrived from Nassau, where he had attempted to induce the owners of the schr. Arctic to take cannon to Wilmington, in North Carolina, for the use of the rebels, and inquired what he should do with the prisoner. J. C. Rahming was thereupon committed into military custody at Fort Lafayette, under a mandate from the Secretary of State. This commitment was made on the 2d day of September. On the 17th of that month this prisoner, after due inquiry, was released from custody on his executing a bond in the penalty of $2,500, with a condition that he should thereafter bear true allegiance to the United States, and d
J. C. Rahming (search for this): article 6
. 14, 1861. Sir: Her Majesty's Government were much concerned to find that two British subjects, Mr. Patrick and Mr. Rahming, had been subjected to arbitrary arrest; and although they had learnt from a telegraphic dispatch from me that Mr. Pat paper you inform me that the British Government is much concerned to find that two British subjects. Mr. Patrick and Mr. Rahming, have been brought under arbitrary arrest, and that although her Majesty's Ministers have been advised by you of the rerintendent of Police in the city of New York informed the Secretary of State, by telegraph, that he had under arrest J. C. Rahming, who had just arrived from Nassau, where he had attempted to induce the owners of the schr. Arctic to take cannon to Wilmington, in North Carolina, for the use of the rebels, and inquired what he should do with the prisoner. J. C. Rahming was thereupon committed into military custody at Fort Lafayette, under a mandate from the Secretary of State. This commitment
William H. Seward (search for this): article 6
Diplomatic correspondence between Secretary Seward and Lord Lyons. The following correspondence between Lord Lyons, representing the Government of Her Britannic Majesty near the Government of the United States, and Mr. Secretary Seward, representing Lincoln's Kingdom, touching the military arrests of two British subjects on tered by Abe Lincoln, cannot fall to be read with interest: Lord Lyons to Mr. Seward. Washington, Oct. 14, 1861. Sir: Her Majesty's Government were much cighest consideration, your most obedient humble servant. Lyons. To the Hon. William H. Seward, &c. Mr. Seward to Lord Lyons. Department of State, WashingtonMr. Seward to Lord Lyons. Department of State, Washington, Oct. 14, 1861. My Lord: --I have the honor to acknowledge your lordship's note of the present date. In that paper you inform me that the British Governmeavail myself of this opportunity to offer to your lordship a renewed assurance of my very high consideration. William H. Seward. The Right Hon. Lord Lyons, &c.
Abel Smith (search for this): article 6
forces actually in the field and besieging the Capital of the United States. A portion of this correspondence, which was intercepted, was addressed to the firm of Smith & Patrick, brokers, long established and doing business in the city of New York. It appeared that this firm had a branch at Mobile, that the partner, Smith, is a Smith, is a disloyal citizen of the United States, and that be was in Europe when the treasonable papers were sent from Mobile, addressed through the house of Smith & Patrick, in New York. On receiving this information Wm. Patrick was arrested and committed into military custody at Fort Lafayette by an order of the Secretary of War of the UniSmith & Patrick, in New York. On receiving this information Wm. Patrick was arrested and committed into military custody at Fort Lafayette by an order of the Secretary of War of the United States addressed to the police of the city of New York. These proceedings took place on the 28th of August last. Representations were thereupon made to the Secretary of State by friends on the part of Mr. Patrick to the effect that not withstanding his associations he was personally loyal to this Government, and that he w
William Patrick (search for this): article 6
much concerned to find that two British subjects, Mr. Patrick and Mr. Rahming, had been subjected to arbitrary d learnt from a telegraphic dispatch from me that Mr. Patrick had been released, they could not but regard the uch concerned to find that two British subjects. Mr. Patrick and Mr. Rahming, have been brought under arbitraristers have been advised by you of the release of Mr. Patrick. yet they cannot but regard the matter as requirs intercepted, was addressed to the firm of Smith & Patrick, brokers, long established and doing business in thfrom Mobile, addressed through the house of Smith & Patrick, in New York. On receiving this information Wm. PaWm. Patrick was arrested and committed into military custody at Fort Lafayette by an order of the Secretary of War of the Secretary of State by friends on the part of Mr. Patrick to the effect that not withstanding his associatiesulted in the establishment of their truth. Mr. William Patrick was thereupon promptly released from custody
1 2