hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
C. L. Vallandigham 36 0 Browse Search
Fort Donelson (Tennessee, United States) 28 0 Browse Search
United States (United States) 24 0 Browse Search
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) 20 0 Browse Search
Hickman 17 17 Browse Search
Price 12 6 Browse Search
North Carolina (North Carolina, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
House 10 0 Browse Search
Alabama (Alabama, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
H. W. Halleck 10 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: February 25, 1862., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 77 total hits in 22 results.

1 2 3
Massachusetts (Massachusetts, United States) (search for this): article 1
been the fate of many in this House and in the other wing of the Capitol? Where would have been the gentleman from the district now represented by my colleague, who made as assault on me the other day? Where would have been the Senator from Massachusetts (Mr. Sumner)? or the other Senator from Massachusetts? or the Senator from New Hampshire (Mr. Hale)? Where would have been the three Senators who, on the 7th of February, 1850, voted to refer, print and consider, a petition to dissolve the UMassachusetts? or the Senator from New Hampshire (Mr. Hale)? Where would have been the three Senators who, on the 7th of February, 1850, voted to refer, print and consider, a petition to dissolve the Union? Yet, I am to be singled out, and they who have watched, and waited, and prayed, from the beginning of this controversy to this hour, that they might get some slip of the tongue, some hasty word spoken, something written, or something that they might fortune into evidence of disloyalty, now seize upon this paper — this miserable, irresponsible sheet — wet from the press, and bring it in here to charge me with disloyalty, and attract the attention of the country. After some further re
Delaware (Delaware, United States) (search for this): article 1
ebate. In the Yankee Congress, on Wednesday, the 19th inst., Mr. Hickman, representative from Pennsylvania in the lower House, rose to a privileged question and sent up to the Clerk the following resolution to be read: Whereas, The Baltimore Clipper of this date contains the following publication: "Documents Found.--During yesterday a police force visited the office of the South newspaper, and took possession of a number of letters written by Senators Bayard and Saulsbury, of Delaware, and the notorious Vallandigham, of Ohio. The documents contain touching sentiment of poor bleeding Dixie, and various suggestions how the Yankees might be defeated." Therefore, Resolved, That the Committee on the Judiciary be directed to inquire into the truth of the allegations therein made against C. L. Vallandigham, a member of this House, with power to send for persons and papers, and to examine witnesses on oath or affirmation, and to make report thereon. Mr. Hickman--I ca
Pennsylvania (Pennsylvania, United States) (search for this): article 1
The Federal Congress. Hon. Mr. Vallandigham again arraigned for disloyalty. Spicy debate. In the Yankee Congress, on Wednesday, the 19th inst., Mr. Hickman, representative from Pennsylvania in the lower House, rose to a privileged question and sent up to the Clerk the following resolution to be read: Whereas, The Baltimore Clipper of this date contains the following publication: "Documents Found.--During yesterday a police force visited the office of the South newsp this miserable falsehood which an irresponsible, unknown editor — a scavenger and crawler in the streets, alleys and gutters of the city of Baltimore — has seen fit to put forth in the local columns of his paper, in order that the member from Pennsylvania may come in here to make charges against a loyal and patriotic man, who has never flattered in his devotion to the stars and stripes, but who has bowed down and worshipped them in his very heart of hearts, from the time when he first knew of t
Dixon, Ill. (Illinois, United States) (search for this): article 1
nt myself, having received it from some source a few moments ago. I do not know, of course, the motive of the gentleman (Mr. Hickman) in bringing it in this shape before the House, nor do I care. My purpose some time since is just what it is now — to give prompt, direct and emphatic contradiction, a flat denial, to the infamous statement in that paragraph. I never wrote a line or letter upon a political subject to the Baltimore South, or to any other paper, or to any man south of Mason and Dixon's line since this controversy began — never. I defy any one to prove it. It is false, infamous, slanderous, beyond endurance, that a man's reputation should be at the mercy of scavengers employed to visit the lowest haunts of vice to get up items for the local editorials of irresponsible newspapers, to parade before the country libellous and slanderous falsehoods like these. I do not object to the controversy, but i avail myself of this opportunity --until the letters shall be produce
Mason, N. H. (New Hampshire, United States) (search for this): article 1
is statement myself, having received it from some source a few moments ago. I do not know, of course, the motive of the gentleman (Mr. Hickman) in bringing it in this shape before the House, nor do I care. My purpose some time since is just what it is now — to give prompt, direct and emphatic contradiction, a flat denial, to the infamous statement in that paragraph. I never wrote a line or letter upon a political subject to the Baltimore South, or to any other paper, or to any man south of Mason and Dixon's line since this controversy began — never. I defy any one to prove it. It is false, infamous, slanderous, beyond endurance, that a man's reputation should be at the mercy of scavengers employed to visit the lowest haunts of vice to get up items for the local editorials of irresponsible newspapers, to parade before the country libellous and slanderous falsehoods like these. I do not object to the controversy, but i avail myself of this opportunity --until the letters shall
New Hampshire (New Hampshire, United States) (search for this): article 1
Senate of the United States--if this had been the criterion, if irresponsible newspaper paragraphs had been regarded as evidence of disloyalty, what would have been the fate of many in this House and in the other wing of the Capitol? Where would have been the gentleman from the district now represented by my colleague, who made as assault on me the other day? Where would have been the Senator from Massachusetts (Mr. Sumner)? or the other Senator from Massachusetts? or the Senator from New Hampshire (Mr. Hale)? Where would have been the three Senators who, on the 7th of February, 1850, voted to refer, print and consider, a petition to dissolve the Union? Yet, I am to be singled out, and they who have watched, and waited, and prayed, from the beginning of this controversy to this hour, that they might get some slip of the tongue, some hasty word spoken, something written, or something that they might fortune into evidence of disloyalty, now seize upon this paper — this miserable, ir
United States (United States) (search for this): article 1
thers, as unbecoming the dignity of the House, to be so engaged. I did intend, as members near me know, to make the first explanation in my Congressional career. I desire that this matter may be fully reported in the gallery, so that my defence may go forth with the charge made on this floor — the infamous statement, that I have been in correspondence with any one in that State, and uttered sentiments inconsistent with my duty, not only as a member of the House, but as a citizen of the United States--one who has taken a solemn oath to support the Constitution, and which, thank God, I never deviated from. I have rights, which, while God lives and I live, I shall exercise for myself, in this house and out of this house, for the purpose of vindicating the rights of American citizens. (Ironical laughter.) Beyond that I have not gone. My sentiments will be found here, on the records of the house, and nowhere else. There is the repository; and foreseeing, more than a year ago — forese
Bayard (search for this): article 1
d for disloyalty. Spicy debate. In the Yankee Congress, on Wednesday, the 19th inst., Mr. Hickman, representative from Pennsylvania in the lower House, rose to a privileged question and sent up to the Clerk the following resolution to be read: Whereas, The Baltimore Clipper of this date contains the following publication: "Documents Found.--During yesterday a police force visited the office of the South newspaper, and took possession of a number of letters written by Senators Bayard and Saulsbury, of Delaware, and the notorious Vallandigham, of Ohio. The documents contain touching sentiment of poor bleeding Dixie, and various suggestions how the Yankees might be defeated." Therefore, Resolved, That the Committee on the Judiciary be directed to inquire into the truth of the allegations therein made against C. L. Vallandigham, a member of this House, with power to send for persons and papers, and to examine witnesses on oath or affirmation, and to make report
C. L. Vallandigham (search for this): article 1
of the allegations therein made against C. L. Vallandigham, a member of this House, with power to swithdraw? Mr. Hickman--Certainly. Mr. Vallandigham--I was just waiting for an opportunity to as we can judge. I refer the gentleman (Mr. Vallandigham) as my answer to the suggestion that I was he never saw it. Who never saw it? Mr. Vallandigham--The author of the paragraph. Mr. Hiken their seats, debate was resumed. Mr. Vallandigham--I call upon the gentleman to specify an er," "order," and renewed confusion. Mr. Vallandigham--I ask and demand a direct answer. Can ht, even when denials accompany them. Mr. Vallandigham--I know that; but the gentleman is not frI will confine myself to one or two. Mr. Vallandigham--Allow me to reply to them one at a time.as given in his honor in his papers. Mr. Vallandigham--Allow me to reply. Mr. Hickman--I arect imputation. That is my answer. Mr. Vallandigham.--The only specification that the gentlem[8 more...]
Hickman (search for this): article 1
kee Congress, on Wednesday, the 19th inst., Mr. Hickman, representative from Pennsylvania in the lofirmation, and to make report thereon. Mr. Hickman--I call the previous question on the resoluof Ohio — Will the gentleman withdraw? Mr. Hickman--Certainly. Mr. Vallandigham--I was just to be brought to trial and execution. Mr. Hickman--The motives which have actuated me in the andigham--The author of the paragraph. Mr. Hickman--I don't care whether it is a local item or Mr. Vallandigham--Name a single one. Mr. Hickman--I do not desire to do injustice to the gennced over and over again on this flow. Mr. Hickman--I know nothing of that. I know that newspbut the gentleman is not free himself. Mr. Hickman--Let the gentleman defend himself and leaveouse, but was induced to seat himself. Mr. Hickman--I do not wish to put the gentleman n a fallow me to reply to them one at a time. Mr. Hickman--The gentleman will have an opportunity to [7 more...]
1 2 3