hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Matching Documents
The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.
Document | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Harper's Encyclopedia of United States History (ed. Benson Lossing) | 26 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 35. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) | 12 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Thomas Wentworth Higginson, Massachusetts in the Army and Navy during the war of 1861-1865, vol. 2 | 11 | 1 | Browse | Search |
The Daily Dispatch: January 24, 1862., [Electronic resource] | 10 | 4 | Browse | Search |
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 17. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) | 6 | 0 | Browse | Search |
The Daily Dispatch: July 29, 1862., [Electronic resource] | 4 | 0 | Browse | Search |
The Daily Dispatch: May 16, 1863., [Electronic resource] | 4 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 31. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) | 3 | 1 | Browse | Search |
The Daily Dispatch: April 9, 1862., [Electronic resource] | 3 | 1 | Browse | Search |
The Daily Dispatch: July 26, 1861., [Electronic resource] | 3 | 1 | Browse | Search |
View all matching documents... |
Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: March 10, 1862., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for William Daniel or search for William Daniel in all documents.
Your search returned 1 result in 1 document section:
Supreme Court of appeals.
--Present: Judges John J. Allen, Wm. Daniel, R. C. L. Moncure, and Wm. J. Robertson.
The following decisions have been rendered by this Court since our last report:
Wright vs. Godwin and others — argued by Arthur A. Morson for the appellant and R. T. Daniel for the appellees — upon an appeal from a decree pronounced by the Circuit Court of King and Queen county.
Decree reversed, and cause remanded for further proceedings.
Virginia Central Railroad vs. Winston — argued by James Lyons for the plaintiff and C. G. Griswold for the defendant — upon a writ of supersedeas to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Hanover.
Judgment affirmed.
Smith's administrator vs. Lloyd's executrix — argued by Francis L. Smith for the plaintiff, and Robert E. Scott for the defendant — upon a writ of supersedeas to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Alexandria county.--Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for further proceedings.
Barksdale and others v