hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 38 0 Browse Search
Andrew Johnson 20 0 Browse Search
Thaddeus Stevens 16 0 Browse Search
Sumner 16 8 Browse Search
Alabama (Alabama, United States) 16 0 Browse Search
Grant 14 12 Browse Search
Christmas 14 0 Browse Search
Mexico, Mo. (Missouri, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
Juarez 12 0 Browse Search
Ortega 12 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: December 22, 1865., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 16 total hits in 9 results.

Wisconsin (Wisconsin, United States) (search for this): article 21
f the case was Christian (colored) ve. R. H. Maury & Co. and R. W. Hughes. It seems, from the records of the Court, that a box, containing bonds and other securities to the amount of some $10,000, was deposited with Maury & Co. for Christian, (as claimed by the plaintiff,) and that R. W. Hughes, acting as administrator, removed the bonds without competent authority. The argument yesterday arose on a motion made by the defendant to postpone the trial till depositions could be taken in Wisconsin. Judge Crump opened the case by making the motion, and holding that the deposition was necessary. Mr. J. Harmer Gilmer, Jr., followed for the petitioner. He argued that the motion arose simply from a spirit of delay; that the deposition was not necessary, and that if it was, the witness should be made to come in person. He said that the second day of January, proximo, had already been act for the final trial of the case upon its merits; and therefore if the Wisconsin witness had any
Crump (search for this): article 21
plaintiff,) and that R. W. Hughes, acting as administrator, removed the bonds without competent authority. The argument yesterday arose on a motion made by the defendant to postpone the trial till depositions could be taken in Wisconsin. Judge Crump opened the case by making the motion, and holding that the deposition was necessary. Mr. J. Harmer Gilmer, Jr., followed for the petitioner. He argued that the motion arose simply from a spirit of delay; that the deposition was not necesf the Wisconsin witness had any thing to say he could get here as well by that time as in six months. Mr. J. H. Gilmer followed for petitioner, contending that in this case time was the essence of justice, and protesting against delay. Judge Crump closed the case by holding that the ordinary courts would grant his motion, and requesting that this tribunal would do the same. The Court decided to take up the case on the 2d of January unless further cause for delay could be shown.
Cass (search for this): article 21
Freedmen's Court — important Cass. --The uninteresting monotony in the proceedings of this tribunal was broken yesterday by the appearance of a case of general interest and of an important character. The style of the case was Christian (colored) ve. R. H. Maury & Co. and R. W. Hughes. It seems, from the records of the Court, that a box, containing bonds and other securities to the amount of some $10,000, was deposited with Maury & Co. for Christian, (as claimed by the plaintiff,) and that R. W. Hughes, acting as administrator, removed the bonds without competent authority. The argument yesterday arose on a motion made by the defendant to postpone the trial till depositions could be taken in Wisconsin. Judge Crump opened the case by making the motion, and holding that the deposition was necessary. Mr. J. Harmer Gilmer, Jr., followed for the petitioner. He argued that the motion arose simply from a spirit of delay; that the deposition was not necessary, and that if
J. Harmer Gilmer (search for this): article 21
The argument yesterday arose on a motion made by the defendant to postpone the trial till depositions could be taken in Wisconsin. Judge Crump opened the case by making the motion, and holding that the deposition was necessary. Mr. J. Harmer Gilmer, Jr., followed for the petitioner. He argued that the motion arose simply from a spirit of delay; that the deposition was not necessary, and that if it was, the witness should be made to come in person. He said that the second day of January, proximo, had already been act for the final trial of the case upon its merits; and therefore if the Wisconsin witness had any thing to say he could get here as well by that time as in six months. Mr. J. H. Gilmer followed for petitioner, contending that in this case time was the essence of justice, and protesting against delay. Judge Crump closed the case by holding that the ordinary courts would grant his motion, and requesting that this tribunal would do the same. The Court
R. H. Maury (search for this): article 21
t — important Cass. --The uninteresting monotony in the proceedings of this tribunal was broken yesterday by the appearance of a case of general interest and of an important character. The style of the case was Christian (colored) ve. R. H. Maury & Co. and R. W. Hughes. It seems, from the records of the Court, that a box, containing bonds and other securities to the amount of some $10,000, was deposited with Maury & Co. for Christian, (as claimed by the plaintiff,) and that R. W. HughMaury & Co. for Christian, (as claimed by the plaintiff,) and that R. W. Hughes, acting as administrator, removed the bonds without competent authority. The argument yesterday arose on a motion made by the defendant to postpone the trial till depositions could be taken in Wisconsin. Judge Crump opened the case by making the motion, and holding that the deposition was necessary. Mr. J. Harmer Gilmer, Jr., followed for the petitioner. He argued that the motion arose simply from a spirit of delay; that the deposition was not necessary, and that if it was, the wi
Robert J. Christian (search for this): article 21
Freedmen's Court — important Cass. --The uninteresting monotony in the proceedings of this tribunal was broken yesterday by the appearance of a case of general interest and of an important character. The style of the case was Christian (colored) ve. R. H. Maury & Co. and R. W. Hughes. It seems, from the records of the Court, that a box, containing bonds and other securities to the amount of some $10,000, was deposited with Maury & Co. for Christian, (as claimed by the plaintiff,) anChristian, (as claimed by the plaintiff,) and that R. W. Hughes, acting as administrator, removed the bonds without competent authority. The argument yesterday arose on a motion made by the defendant to postpone the trial till depositions could be taken in Wisconsin. Judge Crump opened the case by making the motion, and holding that the deposition was necessary. Mr. J. Harmer Gilmer, Jr., followed for the petitioner. He argued that the motion arose simply from a spirit of delay; that the deposition was not necessary, and that
R. W. Hughes (search for this): article 21
--The uninteresting monotony in the proceedings of this tribunal was broken yesterday by the appearance of a case of general interest and of an important character. The style of the case was Christian (colored) ve. R. H. Maury & Co. and R. W. Hughes. It seems, from the records of the Court, that a box, containing bonds and other securities to the amount of some $10,000, was deposited with Maury & Co. for Christian, (as claimed by the plaintiff,) and that R. W. Hughes, acting as administrR. W. Hughes, acting as administrator, removed the bonds without competent authority. The argument yesterday arose on a motion made by the defendant to postpone the trial till depositions could be taken in Wisconsin. Judge Crump opened the case by making the motion, and holding that the deposition was necessary. Mr. J. Harmer Gilmer, Jr., followed for the petitioner. He argued that the motion arose simply from a spirit of delay; that the deposition was not necessary, and that if it was, the witness should be made to
January 2nd (search for this): article 21
hority. The argument yesterday arose on a motion made by the defendant to postpone the trial till depositions could be taken in Wisconsin. Judge Crump opened the case by making the motion, and holding that the deposition was necessary. Mr. J. Harmer Gilmer, Jr., followed for the petitioner. He argued that the motion arose simply from a spirit of delay; that the deposition was not necessary, and that if it was, the witness should be made to come in person. He said that the second day of January, proximo, had already been act for the final trial of the case upon its merits; and therefore if the Wisconsin witness had any thing to say he could get here as well by that time as in six months. Mr. J. H. Gilmer followed for petitioner, contending that in this case time was the essence of justice, and protesting against delay. Judge Crump closed the case by holding that the ordinary courts would grant his motion, and requesting that this tribunal would do the same. T
February, 1 AD (search for this): article 21
ositions could be taken in Wisconsin. Judge Crump opened the case by making the motion, and holding that the deposition was necessary. Mr. J. Harmer Gilmer, Jr., followed for the petitioner. He argued that the motion arose simply from a spirit of delay; that the deposition was not necessary, and that if it was, the witness should be made to come in person. He said that the second day of January, proximo, had already been act for the final trial of the case upon its merits; and therefore if the Wisconsin witness had any thing to say he could get here as well by that time as in six months. Mr. J. H. Gilmer followed for petitioner, contending that in this case time was the essence of justice, and protesting against delay. Judge Crump closed the case by holding that the ordinary courts would grant his motion, and requesting that this tribunal would do the same. The Court decided to take up the case on the 2d of January unless further cause for delay could be shown.