hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Sorting
You can sort these results in two ways:
- By entity
- Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
- By position (current method)
- As the entities appear in the document.
You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.
hide
Most Frequent Entities
The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.
Entity | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
United States (United States) | 34 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Mexico (Mexico, Mexico) | 16 | 0 | Browse | Search |
New England (United States) | 14 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Mary Johnson | 12 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Weith | 12 | 12 | Browse | Search |
Hugh W. Mercer | 11 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Belgium (Belgium) | 10 | 0 | Browse | Search |
W. H. Seward | 10 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Grant | 10 | 8 | Browse | Search |
France (France) | 10 | 0 | Browse | Search |
View all entities in this document... |
Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: December 28, 1865., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.
Found 1 total hit in 1 results.
Garrett (search for this): article 2
The railroad projected by the Baltimore and Ohio railroad company in the Valley of Virginia.
The Lynchburg Virginian gives statistics to prove that the distance from the point of intersection on the Virginia and Tennessee railroad to the city of Baltimore is greater by the proposed route than by the roads already in operation via Lynchburg, Gordonsville, Alexandria, &c., and argues hence that the projected scheme will never be carried out.
The Staunton Spectator is evidently pleased with Mr. Garrett's proposition.
It calls on the people to reflect upon the folly which, years ago, prevented the Baltimore Company from constructing this road, and advises our legislators to countenance the opening of railroads and canals in every part of the State.--the constructors, of course, to pay the expenses.