hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Europe 76 0 Browse Search
Americans 44 0 Browse Search
Lowell 41 5 Browse Search
United States (United States) 36 0 Browse Search
1896 AD 32 32 Browse Search
Walter Scott 32 2 Browse Search
Emerson 26 0 Browse Search
America (Netherlands) 26 0 Browse Search
Matthew Arnold 22 0 Browse Search
Shelley 21 1 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of Thomas Wentworth Higginson, Book and heart: essays on literature and life. Search the whole document.

Found 11 total hits in 7 results.

United States (United States) (search for this): chapter 33
aying different to instead of different from. Another is directly I went rather than directly after I went. It shows how skin-deep is our alleged Anglicism that we Americans hold our own so inflexibly on these points. Probably we are influencing the English in language more than they are affecting us, and not always beneficially; it is now, for instance, far more common to see I expect used for I think by a good English writer than by a good American writer. We are acquiring, it is to be hoped, something more of the English habit of clear and well-cut enunciation, but we are holding out fairly well against the deluge of the coarser class of English words, such as rot and beastly. Nor do we often emulate that high-born young English woman who informed a friend of mine, her hostess, at dinner, that the potatoes were nasty, and on being cautioned that in America we only apply this phrase to something very greasy and offensive, replied that this was precisely what she meant. 1896
still questionable, is excused. Then there are differences of locality. The educated American says It is he, while the educated Englishman still perversely says It is him, and tries to defend it. The same Englishman is astounded when he hears Americans say gotten, and does not himself discover that it is an archaic phrase, Scriptural, but mainly disused in our Northern States, as in England, until it migrated from Virginia northward after the Civil War. One of the few phrases that still remain as the shibboleth of an Englishman is his saying different to instead of different from. Another is directly I went rather than directly after I went. It shows how skin-deep is our alleged Anglicism that we Americans hold our own so inflexibly on these points. Probably we are influencing the English in language more than they are affecting us, and not always beneficially; it is now, for instance, far more common to see I expect used for I think by a good English writer than by a good Ameri
Mary J. Holmes (search for this): chapter 33
urse the speaker might still have been a saint or a hero at heart, but so far as it went the test was conclusive. In Howells's Lady of the Aroostook the young men were appalled at hearing the only young lady on board remark, as an expression of surprise, that she wanted to know. It pointed unerringly, they thought, to a rusticity of breeding. In time she developed other qualities, and one or both of them fell in love with her; nevertheless, there was a certain justice in their inference. Holmes, varying an old line, says that the woman who calculates is lost ; and it is undoubtedly true that we classify a new-comer, without delay, by his language. What we do not always recognize is that there are grades in this classification. If a stranger begins by saying, We was or He done it, we assign him a low place in the school-room of education. He may be a member of Congress, a college professor; no matter; the inference is the same. His morals, his natural intellect, may rank him f
Chapter 33: the test of talk We are all unconsciously testing ourselves, all the time, for the information of those around us, and one of the most familiar tests is that of talk. Emerson says that every man reveals himself at every moment; it is he himself, and nobody else, who assigns his position. Each the herald is who wrote His rank and quartered his own coat. After spending an hour in the dark with a stranger, we can classify him pretty surely as to education, antecedents, and the like, unless he has had the wit to hold his tongue. In that case he is inscrutable. In Coleridge's well-known anecdote the stranger at the dinner-table would forever have remained a dignified and commanding figure, had not the excellence of the apple-dumplings called him for a moment forth from his shell to utter the fatal words, Them's the jockeys for me. After that the case was hopeless; he had betrayed himself in five words. Of course the speaker might still have been a saint or a he
William Dean Howells (search for this): chapter 33
er the fatal words, Them's the jockeys for me. After that the case was hopeless; he had betrayed himself in five words. Of course the speaker might still have been a saint or a hero at heart, but so far as it went the test was conclusive. In Howells's Lady of the Aroostook the young men were appalled at hearing the only young lady on board remark, as an expression of surprise, that she wanted to know. It pointed unerringly, they thought, to a rusticity of breeding. In time she developed om any such grammatical misadventures might still use smaller inelegancies which would also classify them in the ears of the fastidious. They might say, for instance, cute, or I don't know as, or a great ways. Nine-tenths of us, according to Mr. Howells, would use some of these phrases, but there is no question that they will grate upon the ears of the other tenth. They do not touch the morals, the intelligence, the essential good manners, of those who utter them; they simply classify such p
the information of those around us, and one of the most familiar tests is that of talk. Emerson says that every man reveals himself at every moment; it is he himself, and nobody else, who assigns his position. Each the herald is who wrote His rank and quartered his own coat. After spending an hour in the dark with a stranger, we can classify him pretty surely as to education, antecedents, and the like, unless he has had the wit to hold his tongue. In that case he is inscrutable. In Coleridge's well-known anecdote the stranger at the dinner-table would forever have remained a dignified and commanding figure, had not the excellence of the apple-dumplings called him for a moment forth from his shell to utter the fatal words, Them's the jockeys for me. After that the case was hopeless; he had betrayed himself in five words. Of course the speaker might still have been a saint or a hero at heart, but so far as it went the test was conclusive. In Howells's Lady of the Aroostook t
saying different to instead of different from. Another is directly I went rather than directly after I went. It shows how skin-deep is our alleged Anglicism that we Americans hold our own so inflexibly on these points. Probably we are influencing the English in language more than they are affecting us, and not always beneficially; it is now, for instance, far more common to see I expect used for I think by a good English writer than by a good American writer. We are acquiring, it is to be hoped, something more of the English habit of clear and well-cut enunciation, but we are holding out fairly well against the deluge of the coarser class of English words, such as rot and beastly. Nor do we often emulate that high-born young English woman who informed a friend of mine, her hostess, at dinner, that the potatoes were nasty, and on being cautioned that in America we only apply this phrase to something very greasy and offensive, replied that this was precisely what she meant. 1896