hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Braxton Bragg 308 2 Browse Search
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) 250 0 Browse Search
D. C. Buell 231 1 Browse Search
Edgefield (Tennessee, United States) 122 0 Browse Search
Louisville (Kentucky, United States) 97 5 Browse Search
Leonidas Polk 93 1 Browse Search
United States (United States) 92 0 Browse Search
John H. Morgan 82 0 Browse Search
John C. Breckinridge 78 0 Browse Search
W. J. Hardee 77 3 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in Col. J. Stoddard Johnston, Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 9.1, Kentucky (ed. Clement Anselm Evans).

Found 7,533 total hits in 2,645 results.

1 2 3 4 5 6 ...
1800 AD (search for this): chapter 1
tion of the union of the States, dangerous heresies had gained a foothold, and a monarchical element, assuming the theory of a consolidated government, had passed acts such as the alien and sedition laws, and in many ways transcended the limits of the Constitution. By a silent, yet steady and peaceful revolution, our form of government was undergoing a radical change when Mr. Jefferson sounded the note of alarm and, upon the platform of the resolutions of 1798, overthrew the Federal party in 1800 and, in contradistinction to its contention for a strong central government with powers other than those specially delegated to it by the States, established upon a firm basis the opposite and Democratic theory of our government which was maintained for more than half a century. No one dreamed that such principles were treasonable. Mr. Madison, who had been one of the most prominent in framing the Constitution, had used this language, The States being parties to the compact and in their so
1798 AD (search for this): chapter 1
form upon which Thomas Jefferson was elected, which he inspired, if he did not write, and which was introduced in and passed by the general assembly of Kentucky in 1798, had this initial resolution: Resolved, That the several States composing the United States of America are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to taceful revolution, our form of government was undergoing a radical change when Mr. Jefferson sounded the note of alarm and, upon the platform of the resolutions of 1798, overthrew the Federal party in 1800 and, in contradistinction to its contention for a strong central government with powers other than those specially delegated t. Chase and ex-Governor Dennison participated, resolutions were adopted using the language and reaffirming the strongest declaration of the Kentucky resolutions of 1798. In 1861 Wendell Phillips said in a speech at New Bedford, Mass., Here are a series of States girdling the Gulf who think their peculiar institutions require that
1859 AD (search for this): chapter 1
ion, claimed that the right of coercion existed as a means of keeping them in the Union. The whole trend of sentiment in the North as well as the South, while many deprecated the wisdom or necessity of the movement, was that it was a question for them to decide as an exercise of a reserved right. In the North this expression, both as to the broad principle laid down by Mr. Jefferson as heretofore recited, and as to their right to decide for themselves, was clear and without ambiguity. In 1859, at a convention in Cleveland, Ohio, in which Joshua R. Giddings, Senator B. F. Wade, Governor S. P. Chase and ex-Governor Dennison participated, resolutions were adopted using the language and reaffirming the strongest declaration of the Kentucky resolutions of 1798. In 1861 Wendell Phillips said in a speech at New Bedford, Mass., Here are a series of States girdling the Gulf who think their peculiar institutions require that they should have a separate government. They have a right to dec
1861 AD (search for this): chapter 1
of a reserved right. In the North this expression, both as to the broad principle laid down by Mr. Jefferson as heretofore recited, and as to their right to decide for themselves, was clear and without ambiguity. In 1859, at a convention in Cleveland, Ohio, in which Joshua R. Giddings, Senator B. F. Wade, Governor S. P. Chase and ex-Governor Dennison participated, resolutions were adopted using the language and reaffirming the strongest declaration of the Kentucky resolutions of 1798. In 1861 Wendell Phillips said in a speech at New Bedford, Mass., Here are a series of States girdling the Gulf who think their peculiar institutions require that they should have a separate government. They have a right to decide that question without appealing to you or to me. Three days after Mr. Lincoln's election Horace Greeley in the New York Tribune said: If the cotton States shall become satisfied that they can do better out of the Union than in it, we insist on letting them go in peace.
1814 AD (search for this): chapter 1
ible. New York, among others, in ratifying the Constitution declared that the powers delegated by her could be resumed whenever perverted to her injury or oppression, and that every power not granted remained with her. Not only was this so, but Massachusetts was the very first to assert her sovereign rights, to the very verge of active hostility to the Federal government and affiliation with Great Britain in the war of 1812. The Federal laws were nullified by governor and legislature and in 1814, at the darkest period of the war, the legislature declared that it was as much the duty of the State authorities to watch over the rights reserved, as of the United States to exercise the powers which are delegated, and that States which have no common umpire must be their own judges and execute their own decisions. A mere reference to the Hartford Convention is sufficient to indicate the extent to which these sentiments prevailed in New England. As time progressed and the profits of the
Thomas Jefferson (search for this): chapter 1
and Misrepresentation the principles involved in the struggle Mr. Jefferson's views attitude of other Statesmen North and South State Rigst it has made it. The very essence of the platform upon which Thomas Jefferson was elected, which he inspired, if he did not write, and whichon, our form of government was undergoing a radical change when Mr. Jefferson sounded the note of alarm and, upon the platform of the resoluteralist and neither personally nor politically in sympathy with Mr. Jefferson, in rendering a judicial decision in an important case said: Insuch constitutional views and a revival of the Federalism which Mr. Jefferson had overthrown. The protective tariff system was devised as a th this expression, both as to the broad principle laid down by Mr. Jefferson as heretofore recited, and as to their right to decide for themr has not been to strengthen instead of to weaken the doctrine of Jefferson as to the relative rights and duties of the State and Federal go
John Brown (search for this): chapter 1
ied by morality, religion and international law. The present generation, after having been drilled into the belief that the late war was a righteous measure to extirpate the horrid crime of slavery, will, as generations yet to come, find it difficult to understand how such a transition of public sentiment could occur in so short a time—from the embodiment of the most cultured and humane thought on the subject as cited above, to the fanaticism which in a few short years has made a saint of John Brown and declared the author of the emancipation proclamation an inspired man. The crusade once begun, grew rapidly from one of mere fanatical zeal and the agitation by voluntary associations and religious organizations, to the deliberate action of State legislatures, fifteen of which nullified the Constitutional provision and the laws passed to enforce the same, by imposing severe penalties upon those who sought to execute the fugitive slave law. In short, it grew from a small germ of sentimen
Madison (search for this): chapter 1
ergoing a radical change when Mr. Jefferson sounded the note of alarm and, upon the platform of the resolutions of 1798, overthrew the Federal party in 1800 and, in contradistinction to its contention for a strong central government with powers other than those specially delegated to it by the States, established upon a firm basis the opposite and Democratic theory of our government which was maintained for more than half a century. No one dreamed that such principles were treasonable. Mr. Madison, who had been one of the most prominent in framing the Constitution, had used this language, The States being parties to the compact and in their sovereign capacity, it follows of necessity that there can be no tribunal above their authority to decide in the last resort whether the compact made by them be violated, and consequently that, as parties to it, they must decide in the last resort such questions as may be of sufficient magnitude to require their interpretation. Chief Justice Ma
Horace Greeley (search for this): chapter 1
es of States girdling the Gulf who think their peculiar institutions require that they should have a separate government. They have a right to decide that question without appealing to you or to me. Three days after Mr. Lincoln's election Horace Greeley in the New York Tribune said: If the cotton States shall become satisfied that they can do better out of the Union than in it, we insist on letting them go in peace. The right to secede may still be a revolutionary one, but it exists neverthhich passed ordinances of secession before the inauguration of Mr. Lincoln had no reason to believe that their action would meet with the result which so soon changed the feeling of acquiescence in their movement, expressed by Mr. Phillips and Mr. Greeley, into a determination to compel them to remain in the Union by force of arms—an illusive dream from which they awoke too late to avert the consequence of their acts. Justice to the brave men who gave or risked their lives in defense of the
Abraham Lincoln (search for this): chapter 1
, Mass., Here are a series of States girdling the Gulf who think their peculiar institutions require that they should have a separate government. They have a right to decide that question without appealing to you or to me. Three days after Mr. Lincoln's election Horace Greeley in the New York Tribune said: If the cotton States shall become satisfied that they can do better out of the Union than in it, we insist on letting them go in peace. The right to secede may still be a revolutionary oQuotations of a similar character from sources equally as prominent could be multiplied indefinitely, showing that as far as Northern sentiment was concerned, the Southern States which passed ordinances of secession before the inauguration of Mr. Lincoln had no reason to believe that their action would meet with the result which so soon changed the feeling of acquiescence in their movement, expressed by Mr. Phillips and Mr. Greeley, into a determination to compel them to remain in the Union by
1 2 3 4 5 6 ...