hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
General Joseph E. Johnston, Narrative of Military Operations During the Civil War 299 3 Browse Search
William F. Fox, Lt. Col. U. S. V., Regimental Losses in the American Civil War, 1861-1865: A Treatise on the extent and nature of the mortuary losses in the Union regiments, with full and exhaustive statistics compiled from the official records on file in the state military bureaus and at Washington 263 3 Browse Search
William Tecumseh Sherman, Memoirs of General William T. Sherman . 262 60 Browse Search
Benson J. Lossing, Pictorial Field Book of the Civil War. Volume 2. 230 4 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 29. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 209 7 Browse Search
Alfred Roman, The military operations of General Beauregard in the war between the states, 1861 to 1865 180 6 Browse Search
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 3. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.) 178 4 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Documents and Narratives, Volume 10. (ed. Frank Moore) 159 7 Browse Search
Joseph T. Derry , A. M. , Author of School History of the United States; Story of the Confederate War, etc., Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 6, Georgia (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 119 1 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 1. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 105 1 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in Adam Badeau, Military history of Ulysses S. Grant from April 1861 to April 1865. Volume 3. You can also browse the collection for William T. Sherman or search for William T. Sherman in all documents.

Your search returned 450 results in 14 document sections:

nd their communication was to inquire whether Sherman was willing to make a temporary suspension of until the 16th, when Johnston agreed to meet Sherman on the following day at a point midway betweearry out the above programme. The next day Sherman published an order to his troops, beginning: d Grant was ordered to proceed immediately to Sherman's Headquarters and direct in person operationerms which had already been laid down to Lee. Sherman was thoroughly subordinate, and at once notifton immediately communicated the substance of Sherman's dispatches to Davis, and asked for further other interview occurred between Johnston and Sherman, at which no member of the rebel cabinet attey, and the persistency with which he defended Sherman, saved that illustrious soldier from insult, famousthat a man who had done such service as Sherman should be subjected to imputations like these. Sherman's own resentment was intense, and Grant strove hard to appease it, and to bring about [44 more...]
eneral Grant. Washington, D. C., October 2, 1864. Lieutenant-General Grant, City Point: General: Some time since General Sherman asked my opinion in regard to his operations after the capture of Atlanta. While free to give advice to the best ofto make no important movements until they received your instructions. I judge, from a dispatch just received from General Sherman, that he is now proposing to move eastwardly towards Augusta or Millen, expecting to connect with the coast by the Ss to take active measures to fill them, so far as possible, but to make no shipments till further orders. Now, if General Sherman is going east to connect with the coast by the Savannah river, these stores should not be shipped to Mobile or Pensaarge fleets, are enormous. Perhaps it may be desirable that I should give my reasons in brief for concurring with General Sherman in his first proposed plan of operations. In the first place, that line of connection with the coast is the short
with great respect, your obedient servant, W. T. Sherman, Major-General commanding. Memorandum, manding the Confederate army, and Major-General William T. Sherman, commanding the army of the Unite Washington, D. C., April 21, 1865. Major-General W. T. Sherman, commanding Military Division of thwith great respect, your obedient servant, W. T. Sherman, Major-General commanding. General Shered his suggestion. I am, truly, etc., W. T. Sherman, Major-General commanding. Terms of a mthe battle. . . . As ever, your friend, W. T. Sherman. General Sherman to General Grant. Hea) to deeds of infamy. Ever your friend, W. T. Sherman. Endorsement by General Sherman on abov it worth anything as an historic example? W. T. Sherman, General. General Sherman to General Gr As ever, your ardent friend and servant, W. T. Sherman, Major-General. Endorsement by Generald in the consciousness of deeds well done. W. T. Sherman, General. General Townsend to General R[5 more...]
s of, at North, 34; retrograde movement, 85; summoned to Washington, 89; battle of Cedar creek, 95-99; eleven weeks work, 102-105; cutting Virginia Central railroad by, 229-246; movement from Shenandoah Valley to Richmond, 382, 442; at Dinwiddie court-house, 453; movement against Five Forks, 457; battle of Dinwiddie, 471-476; battle of Five Forks, 489-494; relieves Warren from command, 494; at Jetersville, 551-561-565; at battle of Sailor's creek, 566-577; at Appomattox, 591, 611. Sherman, General W. T., relations with Grant, i., 57,183, 454, 572; II., 17, 22-24, 551; III., 161, 162, 362, 363, 436, 631, 635, 649, 650; in command of division, i., 69; battle of Shiloh, 71-91; at Memphis, 109, 128; Yazoo river expedition, 132-138, 143-148; Arkansas Post, 148,149; Steele's bayou, 174-178; opposes Grant's movement south of Vicksburg, 183-185; demonstration against Haine's bluff, 201; Vicksburg campaign, 227-280; assault on Vicksburg, 302-326; siege of Vicksburg, 331-385; denounces McCler