hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
France (France) 14 0 Browse Search
Mexico (Mexico, Mexico) 12 0 Browse Search
England (United Kingdom) 12 0 Browse Search
United States (United States) 10 0 Browse Search
Henry R. Pollard 10 0 Browse Search
Canada (Canada) 8 0 Browse Search
Grant 8 0 Browse Search
Thomas H. S. Boyd 8 0 Browse Search
John R. Lane 8 0 Browse Search
Atlanta (Georgia, United States) 8 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: July 25, 1863., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 13 total hits in 6 results.

France (France) (search for this): article 1
France and recognition. The explanation of the Paris Moniteur, the official journal of France, of the conversation between the Emperor Napoleon and Messrs. Roebuck and Lindsay, shows that Mr. Roeback was too strong in his representation of the tenor of that conversation. Mr. R.'s speech was not at ail discreet, and was well calculated to damage his own motion. No one who properly estimates the sagacity and caution of the French Emperor could suppose, for instance, that he would make a grFrance, of the conversation between the Emperor Napoleon and Messrs. Roebuck and Lindsay, shows that Mr. Roeback was too strong in his representation of the tenor of that conversation. Mr. R.'s speech was not at ail discreet, and was well calculated to damage his own motion. No one who properly estimates the sagacity and caution of the French Emperor could suppose, for instance, that he would make a grave charge of breach of ministerial and international courtesy against the British Government to a British member of Parliament, with authority, or rather request, that he would reject it on the floor of Parliament. He is hardly the man to do that. When he wanted to make a charge or a complaint of the kind public he would likely take some other course more consistent with his own dignity as well as with common propriety. It is probable that, in reporting the remarks of the Emperor touchin
reporting the remarks of the Emperor touching the alleged breach of courtesy of the British Government in communicating to the Federal Government his proposition touching mediation in American allures, he gave his version of a misunderstood conversation, just as he did in stating that the Emperor said he had instructed his Envoy at London to ask the British Government to join him in recognizing the Southern Confederacy, when, according to the Moniteur, he only stated that he would instruct Baron Gros, the French Ambassador, to "sound the intentions of Lord Palmerston" upon this point, and to give him to understand that if the English Cabinet believed that the recognition of the South would put an end to the war the Emperor would be disposed to follow it in this direction. " A very different version, indeed! Mr. Roebuck has obliged the Southern Confederacy with some very just views of its condition, and some warm praizes of the heroism of its people. Moreover be has afforded us
France and recognition. The explanation of the Paris Moniteur, the official journal of France, of the conversation between the Emperor Napoleon and Messrs. Roebuck and Lindsay, shows that Mr. Roeback was too strong in his representation of the tenor of that conversation. Mr. R.'s speech was not at ail discreet, and was well calculated to damage his own motion. No one who properly estimates the sagacity and caution of the French Emperor could suppose, for instance, that he would make a grave charge of breach of ministerial and international courtesy against the British Government to a British member of Parliament, with authority, or rather request, that he would reject it on the floor of Parliament. He is hardly the man to do that. When he wanted to make a charge or a complaint of the kind public he would likely take some other course more consistent with his own dignity as well as with common propriety. It is probable that, in reporting the remarks of the Emperor touchi
Louis Napoleon (search for this): article 1
the Emperor would be disposed to follow it in this direction. " A very different version, indeed! Mr. Roebuck has obliged the Southern Confederacy with some very just views of its condition, and some warm praizes of the heroism of its people. Moreover be has afforded us some gratification by his scathing assaults upon our Northern four, but he is nevertheless, anything but an influential and prudent parliamentation. His evidently extravagant representation of his interview with Louis Napoleon, subjected him to sharp fires from the ministry and its supporters, and will not help his motion. Even Bright, the political ranter, was assisted by it to make a hit. But after all, it makes very little difference what sort of a man makes a motion about recognition at the present time in the British Parliament it would most the same fate that it will probably have with Mr. Roebuck for its patron. Recognition will come when it can have little or not elect; and probably not before.
France and recognition. The explanation of the Paris Moniteur, the official journal of France, of the conversation between the Emperor Napoleon and Messrs. Roebuck and Lindsay, shows that Mr. Roeback was too strong in his representation of the tenor of that conversation. Mr. R.'s speech was not at ail discreet, and was well calculated to damage his own motion. No one who properly estimates the sagacity and caution of the French Emperor could suppose, for instance, that he would make a grave charge of breach of ministerial and international courtesy against the British Government to a British member of Parliament, with authority, or rather request, that he would reject it on the floor of Parliament. He is hardly the man to do that. When he wanted to make a charge or a complaint of the kind public he would likely take some other course more consistent with his own dignity as well as with common propriety. It is probable that, in reporting the remarks of the Emperor touchi
France and recognition. The explanation of the Paris Moniteur, the official journal of France, of the conversation between the Emperor Napoleon and Messrs. Roebuck and Lindsay, shows that Mr. Roeback was too strong in his representation of the tenor of that conversation. Mr. R.'s speech was not at ail discreet, and was well the recognition of the South would put an end to the war the Emperor would be disposed to follow it in this direction. " A very different version, indeed! Mr. Roebuck has obliged the Southern Confederacy with some very just views of its condition, and some warm praizes of the heroism of its people. Moreover be has affordedce what sort of a man makes a motion about recognition at the present time in the British Parliament it would most the same fate that it will probably have with Mr. Roebuck for its patron. Recognition will come when it can have little or not elect; and probably not before. We have learned to regard it with indifference, and the n