hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 24 0 Browse Search
Price 20 6 Browse Search
France (France) 14 0 Browse Search
Abraham Lincoln 12 2 Browse Search
Arkansas (Arkansas, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
Trumbull 11 3 Browse Search
Missouri (Missouri, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
Mexico (Mexico, Mexico) 10 0 Browse Search
Jefferson Davis 10 0 Browse Search
McCulloch 9 3 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: March 8, 1862., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 59 total hits in 32 results.

1 2 3 4
Crilton (search for this): article 16
would shorten their labors. That did not seem to him the way to accomplish the object. Mr. Haynes thought that additional salary would at least be a matter of right, and would at least sweeten their severe labors, and it should be given. Mr. Clark, of Alabama, (interrupting,) on the principle the "laborer is worthy of his hire." The bill did not meet general approval and failed to pass. House of Representatives. Friday, March 7, 1862. In the House of Representatives, Mr. Crilton, of Ala., asked the Chairman of the Military Committee what action had been taken with reference to a resolution he had submitted, several days ago, instructing that committee to inquire into the expediency of raising an additional force of two hundred thousand men. Mr. Miles, on the part of the committee, replied that the committee were about to report a bill on the subject. Mr. Hanley, of Ark., submitted a resolution instructing the Committee on Military Affairs to inquire into the
Rovston (search for this): article 16
everal days ago, instructing that committee to inquire into the expediency of raising an additional force of two hundred thousand men. Mr. Miles, on the part of the committee, replied that the committee were about to report a bill on the subject. Mr. Hanley, of Ark., submitted a resolution instructing the Committee on Military Affairs to inquire into the expediency of constructing fortifications forth with on the Mississippi river at certain points. The resolution was referred. Mr. Rovston, of Arkansas, introduced a bill repealing all laws imposing a duty upon goods imported into the Confederate States from foreign States, excepting the United States, which was referred to the Committee on Commerce. A message from the Senate was received concurring in the following, viz: a resolution declaring the sense of Congress respecting a reunion with the Northern States; a bill creating the office of Commanding General; a bill regulating the destruction of cotton, tobacco, and o
Wright (search for this): article 16
Sect. 2. Be it further enacted, That the owners of property destroyed under the operation of this act, as well as those persons who shall voluntarily destroy their property to prevent the same from falling into the hands of the enemy, are hereby authorized to perpetuate the testimony of such destruction in the manner prescribed by an act of the Provisional Congress, entitled an act to perpetuate testimony in cases of slaves abducted or harbored by the enemy, and of other property seized, wasted or destroyed by them, approved 30th August, 1861, and such owners and persons shall be entitled to indemnity out of the proceeds of property sequestered and confiscated under the laws of the Confederate States, in such manner as Congress may hereafter provide. Upon which ensued a lengthy debate, participated in by Messrs. Curry, Garland, Smith of Virginia, Foote, Crockett, Miles, Royce, Gray, Dupre, Russell, Wright of Georgia, and Lyons of Virginia. The bill was finally adopted.
A. H. Foote (search for this): article 16
mmittees to inquire what would be the cost of 10 small screw steamers, and where they could be built. Mr. Miles introduced a bill to purge the military service of ignorant and inefficient officers. Referred to the Military Committee. Mr. Foote introduced a bill to support public credit, and to purchase the cotton crop at a price not exceeding — cents; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means. Also, a bill to impose an export duty on cotton and tobacco, the growth of theed or destroyed by them, approved 30th August, 1861, and such owners and persons shall be entitled to indemnity out of the proceeds of property sequestered and confiscated under the laws of the Confederate States, in such manner as Congress may hereafter provide. Upon which ensued a lengthy debate, participated in by Messrs. Curry, Garland, Smith of Virginia, Foote, Crockett, Miles, Royce, Gray, Dupre, Russell, Wright of Georgia, and Lyons of Virginia. The bill was finally adopted.
Barnwell (search for this): article 16
ution should have been one of inquiry of the committee whether the clause should be carried out or not, and instructing them to report by bill or otherwise. Mr. Maxwell thus modified his resolution, and it was adopted. Mr. Haynes, of Tennessee, moved to reconsider the vote of yesterday whereby the two writing clerks were allowed only $1,600 per annum. Their duties were arduous; more so indeed than those of the reading clerk. They seldom got through their work before midnight. Mr. Barnwell, of S. C., opposed the resolution, and thought the way to relieve these over-worked men was to employ an additional clerk. While he would not advocate any unnecessary increase, he still wished a sufficient number of clerks to do the work. He did not think that if these men did have to work until midnight, an increase of salary would shorten their labors. That did not seem to him the way to accomplish the object. Mr. Haynes thought that additional salary would at least be a matter
Lambkin Smith (search for this): article 16
Sect. 2. Be it further enacted, That the owners of property destroyed under the operation of this act, as well as those persons who shall voluntarily destroy their property to prevent the same from falling into the hands of the enemy, are hereby authorized to perpetuate the testimony of such destruction in the manner prescribed by an act of the Provisional Congress, entitled an act to perpetuate testimony in cases of slaves abducted or harbored by the enemy, and of other property seized, wasted or destroyed by them, approved 30th August, 1861, and such owners and persons shall be entitled to indemnity out of the proceeds of property sequestered and confiscated under the laws of the Confederate States, in such manner as Congress may hereafter provide. Upon which ensued a lengthy debate, participated in by Messrs. Curry, Garland, Smith of Virginia, Foote, Crockett, Miles, Royce, Gray, Dupre, Russell, Wright of Georgia, and Lyons of Virginia. The bill was finally adopted.
Garland (search for this): article 16
Sect. 2. Be it further enacted, That the owners of property destroyed under the operation of this act, as well as those persons who shall voluntarily destroy their property to prevent the same from falling into the hands of the enemy, are hereby authorized to perpetuate the testimony of such destruction in the manner prescribed by an act of the Provisional Congress, entitled an act to perpetuate testimony in cases of slaves abducted or harbored by the enemy, and of other property seized, wasted or destroyed by them, approved 30th August, 1861, and such owners and persons shall be entitled to indemnity out of the proceeds of property sequestered and confiscated under the laws of the Confederate States, in such manner as Congress may hereafter provide. Upon which ensued a lengthy debate, participated in by Messrs. Curry, Garland, Smith of Virginia, Foote, Crockett, Miles, Royce, Gray, Dupre, Russell, Wright of Georgia, and Lyons of Virginia. The bill was finally adopted.
Maxwell (search for this): article 16
Confederate Congress.first session. Senate. Friday, March 7. In the Senate, Mr. Maxwell, of Florida, offered a resolution instructing the Judiciary Committee to prepare and report a bill to carry into effect the latter clause of the 2d part of section 6th of the Constitution. This relates to the authority given to thand said it was a matter of doubt, until the present Cabinet changes were disposed of, whether the clause of the Constitution should be carried out at all. Mr. Maxwell did not suppose the resolution would bring on debate, or that it would be made the subject of argument. If he had so supposed, the resolution should have been one of inquiry of the committee whether the clause should be carried out or not, and instructing them to report by bill or otherwise. Mr. Maxwell thus modified his resolution, and it was adopted. Mr. Haynes, of Tennessee, moved to reconsider the vote of yesterday whereby the two writing clerks were allowed only $1,600 per ann
Mary A. R. Clark (search for this): article 16
ed men was to employ an additional clerk. While he would not advocate any unnecessary increase, he still wished a sufficient number of clerks to do the work. He did not think that if these men did have to work until midnight, an increase of salary would shorten their labors. That did not seem to him the way to accomplish the object. Mr. Haynes thought that additional salary would at least be a matter of right, and would at least sweeten their severe labors, and it should be given. Mr. Clark, of Alabama, (interrupting,) on the principle the "laborer is worthy of his hire." The bill did not meet general approval and failed to pass. House of Representatives. Friday, March 7, 1862. In the House of Representatives, Mr. Crilton, of Ala., asked the Chairman of the Military Committee what action had been taken with reference to a resolution he had submitted, several days ago, instructing that committee to inquire into the expediency of raising an additional force of two
Hanley (search for this): article 16
s. House of Representatives. Friday, March 7, 1862. In the House of Representatives, Mr. Crilton, of Ala., asked the Chairman of the Military Committee what action had been taken with reference to a resolution he had submitted, several days ago, instructing that committee to inquire into the expediency of raising an additional force of two hundred thousand men. Mr. Miles, on the part of the committee, replied that the committee were about to report a bill on the subject. Mr. Hanley, of Ark., submitted a resolution instructing the Committee on Military Affairs to inquire into the expediency of constructing fortifications forth with on the Mississippi river at certain points. The resolution was referred. Mr. Rovston, of Arkansas, introduced a bill repealing all laws imposing a duty upon goods imported into the Confederate States from foreign States, excepting the United States, which was referred to the Committee on Commerce. A message from the Senate was re
1 2 3 4