hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
George P. Rowell and Company's American Newspaper Directory, containing accurate lists of all the newspapers and periodicals published in the United States and territories, and the dominion of Canada, and British Colonies of North America., together with a description of the towns and cities in which they are published. (ed. George P. Rowell and company) 16 0 Browse Search
Ulysses S. Grant, Personal Memoirs of U. S. Grant 13 3 Browse Search
William F. Fox, Lt. Col. U. S. V., Regimental Losses in the American Civil War, 1861-1865: A Treatise on the extent and nature of the mortuary losses in the Union regiments, with full and exhaustive statistics compiled from the official records on file in the state military bureaus and at Washington 13 3 Browse Search
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 2. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.) 8 0 Browse Search
Adam Badeau, Military history of Ulysses S. Grant from April 1861 to April 1865. Volume 1 7 1 Browse Search
Benson J. Lossing, Pictorial Field Book of the Civil War. Volume 2. 6 0 Browse Search
Owen Wister, Ulysses S. Grant 6 0 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events, Diary from December 17, 1860 - April 30, 1864 (ed. Frank Moore) 4 2 Browse Search
Cambridge History of American Literature: volume 2 (ed. Trent, William Peterfield, 1862-1939., Erskine, John, 1879-1951., Sherman, Stuart Pratt, 1881-1926., Van Doren, Carl, 1885-1950.) 4 0 Browse Search
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 1. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.) 4 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in Abraham Lincoln, Stephen A. Douglas, Debates of Lincoln and Douglas: Carefully Prepared by the Reporters of Each Party at the times of their Delivery.. You can also browse the collection for Springfield (Illinois, United States) or search for Springfield (Illinois, United States) in all documents.

Your search returned 109 results in 14 document sections:

1 2
Abraham Lincoln, Stephen A. Douglas, Debates of Lincoln and Douglas: Carefully Prepared by the Reporters of Each Party at the times of their Delivery., Fourth joint debate, at Charleston, September 18, 1858. (search)
ncoln and Trumbull, as they have now. When, in October, 1884, I went down to Springfield to attend the State Fair, I found the leaders of this party all assembled toi-Nebraska meeting. It was Black Republicans up north, and anti-Nebraska at Springfield. I found Lovejoy, a high-priest of Abolitionism, and Lincoln, one of the leition party. They carried the Legislature in 1854, and when it assembled in Springfield they proceeded to elect a United States Senator, all voting for Lincoln withtoriously public facts which I have stated to you. Col. James H. Matheny, of Springfield, is, and for twenty years has been, the confidential personal and political u see these people are Black Republicans or Abolitionists up north, while at Springfield to-day, they dare not call their Convention Republican, but are obliged to sostile party against all men South? Mr. Lincoln tells you, in his speech at Springfield that a house divided against itself cannot stand ; that this Government, div
Abraham Lincoln, Stephen A. Douglas, Debates of Lincoln and Douglas: Carefully Prepared by the Reporters of Each Party at the times of their Delivery., Fifth joint debate, at Galesburgh, October 7, 1858. (search)
hting for Lincoln as Democrats. Come up to Springfield, where Lincoln now lives and always has livState Convention, in October, 1854, at Springfield, Illinois, and he declared I had taken part in tutions which he read had not been passed at Springfield at all, nor by a State Convention in which romised in that speech that when he went to Springfield he would investigate the matter. Since then Judge Douglas has been to Springfield, and I presume has made the investigation; but a month has h had sat in that same month of October, at Springfield. Rut it is also true that the publication that time. Harris and Douglas were both in Springfield when the Convention was in session, and altes of resolutions as having been adopted at Springfield, in this State, on the 4th or 5th of Octoben adopted at Aurora and Rockford instead of Springfield, I did not wait for him to call my attentioen to me for him, that they were adopted at Springfield, on the 5th of October, 1854, and had sent [4 more...]
Abraham Lincoln, Stephen A. Douglas, Debates of Lincoln and Douglas: Carefully Prepared by the Reporters of Each Party at the times of their Delivery., Sixth joint debate, at Quincy, October 13, 1858. (search)
the Republicans of Illinois reassembled at Springfield, in State Convention, and adopted again theConvention any where-had not been passed at Springfield, where he supposed they had, or assumed thasburgh, I said something in regard to those Springfield resolutions that Judge Douglas had attempteished proceedings of the Convention held at Springfield on the 5th of October, 1854, as they appearcovered that they had never been adopted at Springfield. He does not deny their adoption by the Rence admitted, that they had been adopted at Springfield, as published. Does he believe now, that I at the time, that they had been adopted at Springfield. I would consider myself an infamous wretc States where it exists? In his speech at Springfield before the Abolition or Republican Conventigo in Egypt, as he calls it. It was down at Springfield. That speech is here in this book, and I cthose resolutions, although never passed at Springfield, is retained by their being passed at other[1 more...]
Abraham Lincoln, Stephen A. Douglas, Debates of Lincoln and Douglas: Carefully Prepared by the Reporters of Each Party at the times of their Delivery., The last joint debate, at Alton, October 15, 1858. (search)
the 16th of June the Republican Convention assembled at Springfield and nominated Mr. Lincoln as their candidate for the Unio propositions laid down in the speech of Mr. Lincoln at Springfield, and controverted by me in my reply to him at Chicago. and reaffirming the positions which he had taken in his Springfield speech. In that Chicago speech he even went further tha document, he had arisen in that Convention as he did at Springfield this summer, and addressing himself to the President, ha has stated to-day that in a speech which I made at Springfield, Illinois, I had in a very especial manner complained that the speech itself I spoke of the Dred Scott decision in my Springfield speech, and I was then endeavoring to prove that the Dre extract from a speech of mine, more than a year ago, at Springfield, in discussing this very same question, soon after Judgetendency. The quotation that I happened to make in that Springfield speech, that a house divided against itself cannot stand
1 2