hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Sorting
You can sort these results in two ways:
- By entity
- Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
- By position
- As the entities appear in the document.
You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.
hide
Most Frequent Entities
The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.
Entity | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Fitzhugh Lee | 369 | 33 | Browse | Search |
Stonewall Jackson | 359 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Frederick Grant | 268 | 0 | Browse | Search |
United States (United States) | 246 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Braxton Bragg | 242 | 8 | Browse | Search |
Robert E. Lee | 224 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Jubal A. Early | 221 | 5 | Browse | Search |
Robert Lee | 215 | 1 | Browse | Search |
Robert Edward Lee | 193 | 35 | Browse | Search |
Sheridan | 180 | 2 | Browse | Search |
View all entities in this document... |
Browsing named entities in a specific section of Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 11. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones). Search the whole document.
Found 104 total hits in 29 results.
J. William Jones (search for this): chapter 31
A defence of General Bragg's conduct at Chickamauga. By General W. T. Martin.
Natchez, Miss., Feb'y 3rd, 1883. Rev. J. William Jones, D. D., Secretary Southern Historical Society.:
Dear Sir,—It has seemed to me that more misrepresentation, intentional or otherwise, in regard to his acts and motives, during the late war, fell to the lot of General Bragg than any other prominent Confederate officer.
That he was unselfish, patriotic, and devoted to our cause, few who knew him will doubt.
He has been very severely criticised for failing, it is said, to avail himself of opportunities afforded him by the enemy just previous to and during the battle of Chicamauga.
There are many living officers and men who know how little of blame should have attached to him for Hindman's palpable disobedience of order in McLemore's Cove, and General Polk's failure to attack Crittenden's corps in its isolated position, immediately after Hindman's fiasco.
The September No. 1881, of the South
Hindman (search for this): chapter 31
[7 more...]
McCook (search for this): chapter 31
February 3rd, 1883 AD (search for this): chapter 31
A defence of General Bragg's conduct at Chickamauga. By General W. T. Martin.
Natchez, Miss., Feb'y 3rd, 1883. Rev. J. William Jones, D. D., Secretary Southern Historical Society.:
Dear Sir,—It has seemed to me that more misrepresentation, intentional or otherwise, in regard to his acts and motives, during the late war, fell to the lot of General Bragg than any other prominent Confederate officer.
That he was unselfish, patriotic, and devoted to our cause, few who knew him will doubt.
He has been very severely criticised for failing, it is said, to avail himself of opportunities afforded him by the enemy just previous to and during the battle of Chicamauga.
There are many living officers and men who know how little of blame should have attached to him for Hindman's palpable disobedience of order in McLemore's Cove, and General Polk's failure to attack Crittenden's corps in its isolated position, immediately after Hindman's fiasco.
The September No. 1881, of the Sout
1881 AD (search for this): chapter 31
11th (search for this): chapter 31
10th (search for this): chapter 31
September (search for this): chapter 31
1867 AD (search for this): chapter 31