previous next
[328]

XXII. Secession.


the choice of Presidential Electors, which formerly took place at the discretion of the several States within a limited range, is now required, by act of Congress, to be made on the same day throughout — namely, on the Tuesday next succeeding the first Monday in November. This fell, in 1860, on the 6th of the month; and it was known, before that day had fully expired, that Abraham Lincoln had been clearly designated by the People for their next president, through the choice by his supporters of a majority of the whole number of Electors. Every Free State but New Jersey had chosen the entire Lincoln Electoral ticket; and in New Jersey the refusal of part of the Douglas men to support the “Fusion” ticket (composed of three Douglas, two Bell, and two Breckinridge men), had allowed four of the Lincoln Electors to slip in over the two Bell and the two Breckinridge Electors on the regular Democratic ticket. The three Lincoln Electors who had to confront the full vote of the coalesced anti-Republican parties were defeated by about 4,500 majority. And, although this was not ascertained that night, nor yet the fact that California and Oregon had gone with the other free States, yet there were 169 Lincoln Electors chosen (out of 303) outside of these three States; with, these, Mr. Lincoln had 180, to 123 for all others. Of these, Breckinridge had 72; Bell 39 (from Virginia, Kentucky, and Tennessee); and Douglas barely 12--those of Missouri (9) and 3, as aforesaid, from New Jersey. But, though nowhere in the Electoral, Mr. Douglas was second in the Popular, vote, as will be seen by the following table, wherein the “Fusion” vote is divided between the parties which contributed to it, according to the best estimate that can now be made of their strength respectively:

Free states.

States. Lincoln. Douglas. Breckinridge. Bell.
Maine 62,811 26,693 6,368 2,046
New Hampshire 37,519 25,881 2,112 441
Massachusetts 106,353 34,372 5,939 22,331
Rhode Island 12,244 14,000 21,000 2,707
Connecticut 43,972 15,522 14,641 3,291
Vermont 33,808 6,849 218 1,969
New York 353,804 3203,329 450,000 550,000
New Jersey 58,324 630,000 730,000 82,801
Pennsylvania 268,030 978,871 10100,000 12,776
Ohio 231,610 187,232 11,405 12,194
Indiana 139,033 115,509 12,295 5,306
Illinois 172,161 160,215 2,404 4,913
Michigan 88,480 65,057 805 405
Wisconsin 86,110 65,021 888 161
Minnesota 22,069 11,920 748 62
Iowa 70,409 55,111 1,048 1,748
California 39,173 38,516 34,334 6,817
Oregon 5,270 3,951 5,006 183
 
Total Free States 1,831,180 1,128,049 279,211 130,151

Slave states.

States. Lincoln. Douglas. Breckinridge. Bell.
Delaware 3,815 1,023 7,337 3,864
Maryland 2,294 5,966 42,482 41,760
Virginia 1,929 16,290 74,323 74,681
North Carolina (no ticket) 2,701 48,539 44,990
South Carolina [Chosen by the Legislature.]
Georgia (no ticket) 11,590 51,889 42,886
Alabama (no ticket) 13,651 48,831 27,875
Mississippi (no ticket) 3,283 40,797 25,040
Kentucky 1,364 25,651 53,143 66,058
Tennessee (no ticket) 11,350 64,209 69,274
Missouri 17,028 58,801 31,317 58,372
Arkansas (no ticket) 5,227 28,732 20,094
Louisiana (no ticket) 7,625 22,681 20,204
Florida (no ticket) 367 8,543 5,437
Texas (no ticket) (no ticket) 47,548 1115,438
 
Total Slave States 26,430 163,525 570,871 515,973
Grand Total 1,857,610 1,291,574 850,082 646,124

1 “Fusion” vote apportioned according to the estimated strength of the several contributing parties.

2 “Fusion” vote apportioned according to the estimated strength of the several contributing parties.

3 “Fusion” vote apportioned according to the estimated strength of the several contributing parties.

4 “Fusion” vote apportioned according to the estimated strength of the several contributing parties.

5 “Fusion” vote apportioned according to the estimated strength of the several contributing parties.

6 “Fusion” vote apportioned according to the estimated strength of the several contributing parties.

7 “Fusion” vote apportioned according to the estimated strength of the several contributing parties.

8 “Fusion” vote apportioned according to the estimated strength of the several contributing parties.

9 “Fusion” vote apportioned according to the estimated strength of the several contributing parties.

10 “Fusion” vote apportioned according to the estimated strength of the several contributing parties.

11 This anti-Breckinridge vote was cast for a “Fusion” Electoral ticket, but almost entirely by old ‘Whigs’ o<*> Bell men.

Lincoln over Douglas, 566,036; Do. over Bell, 1,211,486; do. over Breckinridge, 1,007,528.

Lincoln has less than all his opponents combined, by 930,170.

Breckinridge had in the Slave States over Bell, 54,898; do. over Douglas, 407,346; do. over Douglas and Lincoln, 380,916.

Breckinridge lacks of a majority in the Slave States, 135,057.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Places (automatically extracted)

View a map of the most frequently mentioned places in this document.

Sort places alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a place to search for it in this document.
New Jersey (New Jersey, United States) (4)
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) (3)
Missouri (Missouri, United States) (3)
Kentucky (Kentucky, United States) (3)
Georgia (Georgia, United States) (3)
Texas (Texas, United States) (2)
Oregon (Oregon, United States) (2)
North Carolina (North Carolina, United States) (2)
Mississippi (Mississippi, United States) (2)
Maryland (Maryland, United States) (2)
Louisiana (Louisiana, United States) (2)
Florida (Florida, United States) (2)
Delaware (Delaware, United States) (2)
California (California, United States) (2)
Arkansas (Arkansas, United States) (2)
Alabama (Alabama, United States) (2)
Wisconsin (Wisconsin, United States) (1)
Vermont (Vermont, United States) (1)
South Carolina (South Carolina, United States) (1)
Rhode Island (Rhode Island, United States) (1)
Pennsylvania (Pennsylvania, United States) (1)
Ohio (Ohio, United States) (1)
New Hampshire (New Hampshire, United States) (1)
Minnesota (Minnesota, United States) (1)
Michigan (Michigan, United States) (1)
Massachusetts (Massachusetts, United States) (1)
Maine (Maine, United States) (1)
Iowa (Iowa, United States) (1)
Indiana (Indiana, United States) (1)
Illinois (Illinois, United States) (1)
Connecticut (Connecticut, United States) (1)

Download Pleiades ancient places geospacial dataset for this text.

hide People (automatically extracted)
hide Dates (automatically extracted)
Sort dates alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a date to search for it in this document.
1860 AD (1)
November (1)
6th (1)
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: