[47] Admovi iugulo, sine me tibi vera fateri. Some, instead of this line, read,
At rursus monitis, iussuque coacta parentis. Heinsius thinks that both this and the following verse ought to be rejected, as the interpolations of some ignorant grammarian, who imagined them necessary to fill up and connect the sense: and the same commentator observes, that the coherence is plain beyond exception, if we merely change the sed of the next verse into et. The remark is ingenious, and seems to be well founded.Hide browse bar Your current position in the text is marked in blue. Click anywhere in the line to jump to another position:
This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
NSF, NEH: Digital Libraries Initiative, Phase 2 provided support for entering this text.
This text was converted to electronic form by optical character recognition and has been proofread to a low level of accuracy.
Purchase a copy of this text (not necessarily the same edition) from Amazon.com
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.