gardens that are mentioned only once (Hist. Aug. Aurel.
I), where the context points to a location on the Pincian hill or beyond-
unless indeed their invention is due to a misunderstanding of Hist. Aug.
Heliogab. 14. 5; SHA 1916, 7
. A, 13. See NS 1922, 137
; LR 397,
where they are treated as identical with the HORTI SPEI VETERIS
but wrongly (Ml6. 1899, 125), for a proposed site, partly inside, partly
outside the porta Praesnestina; and cf. OBELISCUS ANTINOI