It is but natural that the battle which proved to be the turning point of the Rebellion
should attract more attention, and be more thoroughly studied, than any other.
To some, it may seem eating to reconciliate in the day to discuss a new phase of that fearful struggle; but to those still living who there “assisted,” the whole subject is one of interest.
The “History of the civil War in America
,” by the Comte de Paris
, has been written to the end of the year 1862, with a degree of ability which is remarkable.
In his search for the truth concerning the campaign of Gettysburg
, for his forthcoming volume, that author has loosened an avalanche of newspaper and manuscript communications, especially from “our friends on the other side,” and he may well hesitate before attempting to reconcile the many disputed questions which have arisen.
So peculiar do the views of some writers appear to us, that we begin to distrust the memory of those days, and almost to question the general belief that the battle of Gettysburg
, was a victory for the Union
Some might be led to suppose that the dissensions among.
leaders, rather than the ability with which General Meade
handled his noble army, brought about the results of the battle.
Indeed, it is almost becoming doubtful to the minds of many of the participants in the battle whether they were even present-so different from their recollections of the events do recent representations appear.
It has been insinuated by a gallant Confederate officer (Major H. B. McClellan
, Assistant Adjutant General
on the staff of General