[
254]
probable the assumption that its appearance was somewhat delayed, awaiting the issue of the struggle in
Maryland, which terminated with the
battle of Antietam.
1
Whether the open adhesion of the
President at last to the policy of Emancipation did or did not contribute to the general defeat of his supporters in the
State Elections which soon followed, is still fairly disputable.
By those elections,
Horatio Seymour was made Governor of New York and
Joel Parker of
New Jersey: supplanting
Governors Morgan and
Olden; while
Pennsylvania,
Ohio,
Indiana, and
Illinois, also gave Opposition majorities; and
Michigan,
Wisconsin, and most other Western States, showed a decided falling off in Administration strength.
The general result of those elections is summed up in the following table:
1860--President. | 1862--Gov. Or Congress. |
States. | Lincoln. | All others. | Admin. | Opp. |
New York | 362,646 | 312,510 | 295,897 | 306,649 |
New Jersey | 58,324 | 62,801 | 46,710 | 61,307 |
Pennsylvania | 268,030 | 208,412 | 215,616 | 219,140 |
Ohio | 231,610 | 210,831 | 178,755 | 184,332 |
Indiana | 13<*>,033 | 133,110 | 118,517 | 128,160 |
Illinois | 172,161 | 169,215 | 120,116 | 136,662 |
Michigan | 88,480 | 66,267 | 68,716 | 62,102 |
Wisconsin | 86,11<*> | 66,070 | 66,801 | 67,985 |
Iowa | 70,409 | 57,922 | 266,014 | 50,898 |
Minnesota | 22,069 | 12,668 | 15,754 | 11,442 |
| | | | |
10 States | 1,498,872 | 1,290,806 | 1,192,896 | 1,228,677 |
1860--Lincoln's maj--208,066. | 1862--Opp.
maj.--35,781. |
The Representatives in Congress chosen from these States were politically classified as follows:
note.--A new apportionment under the Census of 1860 changed materially, between 1860 and 1862, the number of Representatives from several of the States.
There were some counterbalancing changes in the States of
Delaware,
Maryland,
Kentucky, and
Missouri, as also in that of
California, where the larger share of the Douglas vote of 1860 was in 1862 cast for the
Union tickets; but it was clear, at the close of the
State Elections of that year, that the general ill success of the
War for the
Union, the wide-spread and increasing repugnance to Conscription, Taxation, a depreciated Currency, and high-priced Fabrics, were arraying Public Sentiment against the further prosecution of the contest.
Of course, the Opposition inveighed against the management of the
War and of the Finances, the treatment of
Gen. McClellan, and the general inefficiency and incapacity of the Administration ; but the strength of that Opposition inhered in popular repugnance to the sacrifices; exacted by and the perils involved in a prosecution of the struggle, though its most general and taking clamor deprecated only “The perversion of the
War for the
Union into a War for the Negro.”
Ignoring the soldiers battling for the
Union--of whom at least three-fourths voted Republican at least three-fourths voted Republican at each election wherein they were allowed to vote at all; but who had not yet been enabled to vote in the field, while their absence created a chasm in the Administration vote at home — it is quite probable that, had a popular election been held at any time during the year following the Fourth of July, 1862, on the question of continuing the
War or arresting it on the best attainable terms, a majority would have voted for Peace; while it is highly probable