This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
Chapter
30
: addresses before colleges and lyceums.—active interest in reforms.—friendships.—personal life.—
1845
-
1850
.
Chapter
36
:
first
session in Congress.—welcome to
Kossuth
.—public lands in the
West
.—the
Fugitive Slave Law
.—
1851
-
1852
.
Chapter
37
: the national election of
1852
.—the
Massachusetts
constitutional convention
.—final defeat of the coalition.—
1852
-
1853
.
Chapter
38
: repeal of the
Missouri Compromise
.—reply to
Butler
and
Mason
.—the
Republican Party
.—address on Granville Sharp.—friendly correspondence.—
1853
-
1854
.
[96]
them, according to Dr. Julius, ‘a rare moderation and excellent temper.’1
The discussions of 1846 and 1847, which had discredited the character of the managers for efficiency, fairness, and breadth of view, were a fatal blow to the Society, and it never recovered public confidence.
In May, 1848, Sumner appeared before the managers, and sought in vain to impress them with his views in favor of more vigorous action.
the same month, the Society decided to hold no more public meetings, and recalled the notice of one already announced.
Mr. Ticknor and George T. Curtis attended the meeting where this decision was made, and both were chosen officers for the first time.
They had taken no interest in the subject before, and their political hostility to Sumner and Dr. Howe, as well as Mr. Ticknor's kinship with Mr. Eliot, account for their selection.
Eliot became president; and Dwight continued in office till his death, in 1854.
In 1855 no officers were chosen, and Mr. Eliot took the chair in the presence of three reporters and only two members.
The officers recommended a dissolution of the Society, for the reason that no suitable successor to Dwight could be found.
There was a week's adjournment to consider the disposition of the funds, and there the record ends.
A part of the amount still in the treasury was spent in the useless republication, in three huge volumes, of Dwight's reports, which were of little value in themselves, and already sufficiently distributed.
The Society was in its later years kept alive for his support, and with his death it disappeared.
Sumner did not again recur to the controversy as to the two rival systems of prison discipline.
As is often the case in human life, He doubtless came to see that its importance had been overrated, or that it called rather for scientific treatment than for excited debate.
Once, late in life, he had a practical connection with the construction of a prison, in 1872, when, as a member of the Senate committee on the District of Columbia, he insisted that there should be a house of correction established with the jail about to be built in Washington, and after applying to E. L. Pierce for suggestions as to a proper model, caused one hundred
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.