previous next
[10] Although omission is a most serious defect in1 classification, two points have been overlooked in [p. 13] the foregoing:2 for we usually consider not only whether an action is morally right or morally wrong, but also, when a choice of two morally right courses is offered, which one is morally better; and likewise, when a choice of two expedients is offered, which one is more expedient. Thus the question which Panaetius thought threefold ought, we find, to be divided into five parts. First, therefore, we must discuss the moral—and that, under two sub-heads; secondly, in the same manner, the expedient; and finally, the cases where they must be weighed against each other.

1 The question is fivefold.

2 For Panaetius was a Stoic, and the Stoics did not admit that there were any degrees of right or wrong.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

load focus Introduction (Walter Miller, 1913)
load focus Latin (Walter Miller, 1913)
hide References (44 total)
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: