This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
On The Estate Of Aristarchus
 That the estate, then, belonged to my mother from the beginning and that she has been unjustly deprived of it by my opponents, has, I think, been sufficiently demonstrated by my arguments, by the evidence which has been produced, and by the citation of the actual laws. Indeed, these men are so perfectly well aware that they are wrongfully in possession of this fortune that they do not rest their argument solely upon the legality of the introduction of Aristarchus （II.） to the members of the ward, but also allege that Xenaenetus's father has paid a judgement-debt on behalf of the estate1 in order that, if their claim on the former ground should not seem just, it may appear that they have a good claim to the estate on the second ground.
1 Wyse suggests that Aristarchus I. died in debt to the state and therefore without civic rights, and that Cyronides settled his liabilities to save the estate from confiscation and the heir from the disabilities which he would inherit.