3.
[10]
I see you, O Romans, moved either by the impudence of the law or of the speech, as indeed
you must be from the nature of the case; by the impudence of the law, which gives a better
title to estates possessed by virtue of Sulla's donation than to hereditary property; by the
impudence of the speech which, in such a cause is that, dares to accuse any one, and yet
vehemently, too vehemently, to defend the principles of Sulla. But if the law only ratified
all the allotments which had been given by Sulla, I should not say a word, provided he would
confess himself to be a partisan of Sulla's. But he does not only protect their existing
interests, but he even adds to their present possessions some sort of gift. And he, who
accuses me, saying that the possessions resting on Sulla's title are defended by me, not only
con firms them him sell, but even institutes fresh allotments, and rises up among us a new
Sulla.
[11]
For just take notice what great grants of lands
this reprover of ours endeavours to make by one single word. “Whatever has been
given, or presented, or granted, or sold”—I can bear it; I hear it; what
comes next?—“shall be held as absolute property.” has a tribune
of the people ventured to propose that whatever any one has become possessed of' since the
consulship of Marius and Carbo, he shall hold by the
firmest right that any one can hold private property? Suppose he drove out the former
proprietors by violence? Suppose he became possessed of it in some underhand manner, or only
by some one's permission for a time? By this law then all civil rights, all legitimate
titles, all interdicts of the praetors will be put an end to.
[12]
It is no unimportant case, it is no insignificant injury that is concealed
under this expression, O Romans. For there were many estates confiscated by the Cornelian law, which were never assigned or sold to any one,
but which are occupied in the most impudent manner by a few men, These are the men for whom
he provides, these are the men whom he defends, whom he makes private proprietors. These
lands, I say, which Sulla gave to no one, Rullus does not choose to assign to you, but to
sacrifice to the men who are in occupation of them. I ask the reason why you should allow
those lands in Italy, in Sicily, in the two Spains, in Macedonia, and Asia, which your
ancestors acquired for you, to be sold, when you see those lands which are your own
sacrificed by the same law to their existing occupiers?
[13]
Now you will understand the whole law, and perceive, that it is framed to
secure the power of a few individuals, and admirably adapted to the circumstances of Sulla's
allotments. For this man's father-in-law is a most excellent man, nor am I saying a word
against his character; but I am discussing the impudence of his son-in-law. For he wishes to
keep what he has got possession of, and does not conceal that he is one of Sulla's party.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.