previous next

[397] It was doubted in Serv.'s time whether ‘Ditis’ went with ‘dominam’ or with ‘thalamo.’ There seems, however, no authority for the use of ‘domina’ with a gen. in ordinary writing for ‘uxor,’ nor perhaps for that of the Greek δέσποινα, which Serv. adduces, though a wife is often so called in relation to the inferior members of the household, and even by her husband in the language of compliment. Even the English ‘lady’ would hardly be used of a wife in plain speaking or writing, though common enough in the conventional language of society. ‘Dominam’ then is to be taken separately, and explained either in relation to ‘thalamo,’ or as said by Charon of his mistress and the queen of the shades, as it is frequently used of goddesses; see on 3. 113. The use of δέσποινα as a special title of Proserpine (see Lidd. and Scott) contributes further to make it appropriate here. ‘Adoriri’ with inf. Lucr. 3.515.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Places (automatically extracted)

View a map of the most frequently mentioned places in this document.

Download Pleiades ancient places geospacial dataset for this text.

hide References (1 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (1):
    • Lucretius, De Rerum Natura, 3.515
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: