fool
“and death—To please the,”
PERICLES, iii. 2. 42.
“I have seen (though present means of reference to it are
beyond my reach) an old Flemish print in which Death is exhibited in the act of plundering a miser of his bags, and the
Fool (discriminated by his bauble, etc.) is
standing behind, and grinning at the process”
(STEEVENS)
.
“Cerimon in most express terms declares that he feels more
real satisfaction in his liberal employment as a physician, than he should in the
uncertain pursuit of honour, or in the mere accumulation of wealth; which would assimilate
him to a miser, the result of whose labour is merely to entertain the fool and death. . .
. The allusion therefore is to some such print as Mr. Steevens happily remembered to have
seen, in which death plunders the miser of his money-bags, whilst the fool is grinning at
the process. It may be presumed that these subjects were common in Shakespeare's time.
They might have ornamented the poor man's cottage in the shape of rude prints, or have
been introduced into halfpenny ballads long since consigned to oblivion. The miser is at
all times fair game; and to prove that this is not a chimerical opinion, and at the same
time to show the extensive range of this popular subject, a few prints of the kind shall
be mentioned. 1. Death and the two misers, by Michael Pregel. 2. An old couple counting
their money, death and two devils attending, a mezzotint by Vander Bruggen. 3. A similar
mezzotint by Meheux without the devils. 4. An old print on a single sheet of a dance of death, on which both the
miser and the fool are exhibited in the clutches of the grim monarch. The rear may be
closed with the same subject as represented in the various dances of death that still remain. Nor should it be concluded that because
these prints exhibit no fool to grin at the impending scene, others might not have done
so. The satirical introduction of this character on many occasions supports the
probability that they did. Thus in a painting of the school of Holbein, an old man makes
love to a girl, attended by a fool and death, to show, in the first instance, the folly of
the thing, and, in the next, its consequences. It is un necessary to pursue the argument,
as every print of the above kind that may in future occur will itself speak much more
forcibly than any thing which can here be added”
(DOUCE)
.

