previous next

VERBS, AUXILIARY. Should denotes contingent futurity

Should. Should is the past tense of shall, and underwent the same modifications of meaning as shall. Hence should is not now used with the second person to denote mere futurity, since it suggests a notion, if not of compulsion, at least of bounden duty. But in a conditional phrase, "If you should refuse," there can be no suspicion of compulsion. We therefore retain this use of should in the conditional clause, but use would in the consequent clause:
If you should refuse, you would do wrong.
On the other hand, Shakespeare used should in both clauses:

“You should refuse to perform your father's will if you should
refuse to accept him.

And should is frequently thus used to denote contingent futurity.

“They told me here, at dead time of the night,
Ten thousand swelling toads, as many urchins,
Would make such fearful and confused cries,
As any mortal body hearing it
Should straight fall mad.

"Would" = "were in the habit." Comp. ἐφίλουν.

“(In that case) Strength should be lord of imbecility,
And the rude son should strike the father dead;
Force should be right.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: