previous next


VERBS, AUXILIARY. Should, "should have," Shakespearian use of

"Should have" with the second and third persons. The use of "should have" with the second and third persons is to be noted. It there refers to the past, and the should simply gives a conditional force to "have." It is incongruous to use should in connection with the past, and hence we now say "If an angel had come" in this sense. When we use "should have," it refers to a question about the past which is to be answered in the future. "If he should have forgotten the key, how should we get out," i.e "if, when he comes, it should turn out that he had forgotten." Compare, on the other hand, the Shakespearian usage.

“Gods, if you
Should have ta'en vengeance on my faults, I never
Had lived to put on this.

In M. Ado, ii. 3. 81, the "should have" is inserted, not in the conditional clause, but in a dependent relative clause. "If it had been a dog that should have howled thus, they would have killed him."

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: