previous next


CONJUNCTIONS. But taking the place of the subject

But (in phrases like "there is no man but hates me," where a subject immediately precedes but) often expels the subject from the following relative clause. This perhaps arose in part from a reluctance to repeat a subject which was already emphatically expressed. See 244. For the same reason the relative is omitted in such expressions as

“There is no creature loves me.

In such cases we still sometimes omit the subject, but perhaps not often where but is separated from the preceding subject, as in

“There is no vice so simple but assumes
Some mark of virtue in its outward parts.

On the other hand, this omission is not found in the earliest stages of the language (Mätzner, iii. p. 469), and thus we find the subject frequently retained in Shakespeare:

“I found no man but he was true to me.

“There's ne'er a villain dwelling in all Denmark
But he's an arrant knave.

Less frequently but expels the object in the relative clause:

“No jocund health that Denmark drinks to-day
But the great cannon to the clouds shall tell.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: