It is true （οὖν, cp. 483） that gods indeed （μέν） have perfect knowledge. But there is no way of deciding in a strict sense （ἀληθής） that any mortal who essays to read the future attains to more than I do— i.e. to more than conjecture: though I admit that one man may excel another in the art of interpreting omens according to the general rules of augural lore （σοφίᾳ: cp. σοφὸς οἰωνοθέτας 484）. The disquieted speaker clings to the negative argument: “Teiresias is more likely to be right than a common man: still it is not certain that he is right.”
This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.