It is more likely that, as our MSS. suggest, παθεῖν should have been a commentator's conjecture than that θανεῖν should have been a copyist's error （from v. 713）. No objection can be drawn from the occurrence of πρὸς παιδὸς θανεῖν so soon after 713: see on 519.
This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.