εἰσόμεσθα, μή τι … καλύπτει, ‘we shall know (about our fear) lest (“μή”) she is concealing,’ i.e., whether we are right in fearing that she conceals something. As Goodwin says (Moods and Tenses, § 46, N. 5 a), this passage is one of the most favourable to the view that “μή” has an interrogative force, and yet here also “μὴ καλύπτει” plainly expresses a fear. The pres. indic. is used, because the fear is strictly present; there is no thought that the thing feared can possibly be prevented. Before assuming that “μή” could have the force of “εἰ οὐ” (‘whether not’), we should require an example in which the clause with “μή”, after a verb like “οἶδα”, expressed something which is not feared (but hoped; or else regarded with neither fear nor hope). As if here we had, “εἰσόμεσθα μὴ ζήσειν ἔτι μέλλει”. Cp. 278 n. The use of “μή” in direct question (O. C. 1502) is, of course, elliptical: e.g., “μὴ οὕτως ἔχει”; comes from (“δέδοικα”) “μὴ οὕτως ἔχει.” καὶ (‘indeed’) goes with the whole phrase κατάσχετον … καλύπτει: cp. 770n. κατάσχετον, a poet. word, here=‘repressed’ (cp. El. 1011 “κατάσχες ὀργήν”): usu., ‘possessed’ (by a god, or by passion), like “κάτοχος”.
This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.