κοὐκ ἀρκέσει, not “μηδ̓”, though εἰ precedes, for “οὐκ ἀρκέσει” is felt rather as a statement of that which is sure to happen, than as a hypothesis. Similarly “οὐ” often stands in the second of two clauses after “δεινὸν εἰ” or the like: Thuc. 1. 121§ 5 “δεινὸν ἂν εἴη εἰ...οὐκ ἄρα δαπανήσομεν”: Lys. or. 10 § 13 “οὐκ οὖν δεινόν, εἰ...οὐκ ἀξιοῖς”.
This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.