ἀνδρὸς οὐκέτ᾽ ὄντος, genitive absolute. The genitive could not depend on ὑβρίζεις, in the sense of ‘uttering insults about him’ (like “ποίου κέκραγας ἀνδρὸς” in 1236). The constr. with gen. absolute (‘when he is dead’) is also more forcible. Reiske's conjecture (“ἄνδρας..ὄντας..σκιάς”) is ingenious; but here the plural is evidently less fitting than in a general allusion like “ἐν θανοῦσιν ὑβριστής” (1092). σκιᾶς: cp. El. 1158“ἀντὶ φιλτάτης ι μορφῆς σποδόν τε καὶ σκιὰν ἀνωφελῆ”.
This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.