παῖδα, where the dat. “παιδὶ” is also admissible: cp. Ant. 838 n. κεκλῆσθαι: cp. fr. 83 “καταρκεῖ τοῦδε κεκλῆσθαι πατρός”. By forgetting her duty to her father, she as it were repudiates him, and will be known only as Clytaemnestra's daughter. Here (as in 341 f.) it is implied that the paternal claim on filial piety is naturally stronger than the maternal ( Aesch. Eum. 658 ff.: Eur. Or. 552 f.). In the case of a son, “τὸ μητρὸς καλεῖσθαι” conveyed a reproach of effeminacy: thus in Soph. fr. 139 (from a satyrplay) a boy is described as now too old “μητρὸς καλεῖσθαι παῖσα, τοῦ πατρὸς παρόν”. (See, too, Eur. El. 933 ff.)
This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.