οὐ γὰρ ἐν φάει γ᾽ ἔτι. Hermann's deletion of the “ἔστ̓” before ἐν is probable on metrical grounds; and the interpolation might easily have arisen, as he says, from a superscript gloss “ἐστί”. On the other hand it is simpler and better to understand “ἐστί” than (as Hermann prefers) “ματεύων”.
This text is part of:
Table of Contents: