previous next

ὡς ὁρᾷς. I receive this slight and easy correction of εἰσορᾷς, holding that the latter does not admit of any sound defence. Various explanations of it have been attempted. (1) Seidler: εἰσορᾷς governs the gen. No one would now maintain this: the alleged instances are irrelevant ( Ar. Ran.815παρίδῃ” with a gen. absol.: M. 1. 1. 11 “οὐδεὶς δὲ τώποτε Σωκράτους οὐδὲν ἀσεβὲς...οὔτε πράττοντος εἶδεν”, etc., where the verb governs the acc., and the gen. is possessive). (2) Hermann: the constr. is, ὡς (‘since’), ἕρποντος ἐμοῦ, εἰσορᾷς (“τοῦτο, ἕρποντά με”). But “ὡς” must go with the gen. absol. (3) Nauck: ὡς ἕρποντος ἐμοῦ, (“οὕτως”) εἰσορᾷς (“ἐμὲ ἕρποντα”). But (a) this implies a harsh asyndeton (“δίδαξονεἰσορᾷς”): and (b) the constr. is not justified by Ai.281ὡς ὧδ᾽ ἐχόντων τῶνδ᾽ ἐπίστασθαί σε χρή” (cp. Ant.1179 n.). (4) Matthiae: there is a confusion between εἰσορᾷς ὡς ἕρποντος ἐμοῦ, and “ὡς” (since) “εἰσορᾷς ἕρποντα εμέ”. (5) Dindorf: εἰσορᾷς is parenthetic. This is the best plea: but it does not suit the idiom of tragedy. The parenthetic “ὁρᾷς” (interrogative) does not support it.

As regards ὡς ὁρᾷς, Blaydes well points out that a double ὡς occurs elsewhere: 1241 “τάχ̓, ὡς ἔοικας, ὡς νοσεῖς φράσεις”: Ant.735ὁρᾷς τάδ᾽ ὡς εἴρηκας ὡς ἄγαν νέος; El.1341ἤγγειλας, ὡς ἔοικεν, ὡς τεθνηκότα”: and cp. the double “ὥστε” in Ai.729.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (6 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (6):
    • Aristophanes, Frogs, 815
    • Sophocles, Ajax, 281
    • Sophocles, Ajax, 729
    • Sophocles, Antigone, 1179
    • Sophocles, Antigone, 735
    • Sophocles, Electra, 1341
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: