previous next

Book 22 (Χ

πεφυζότες, see on 21.6.

[2] ἀπεψύχοντο, “διχῶς, καὶ ἀνεψύχοντο καὶ ἀπεψύχοντο: χαριεστέρα δὲ διὰ τοῦ ν”, Did. (A); but “ δὲ Ἀρίσταρχος ἀνεψύχοντο γράφει. χαριέστερον δὲ τὸ ἀπεψύχοντο”, B (the last sentence also in T'. Both these contradictory statements are suspicious; “ἀπό” is clearly the preposition required, and there is no hint of a variation where the word recurs (11.621, 21.561). In 5.795, 10.575ἀνα”- is in place. ἀκέοντο, a unique use. The word is regularly used of healing wounds; but is found also of patching up ships Od. 14.383, and repairing an error 13.115, Od. 10.69.

[4] σάκε᾽ ὤμοισι κλίναντες, see 11.593, 13.488. In both these cases the formation is destined to receive a charge of the enemy. How it could serve in an advance is by no means clear, as the soldiers' right arms would be impeded. It may mean that the approach to the walls is a mere reconnaissance carried out with all defensive precautions. But even so we should rather have expected the “ὑψόσ᾽ ἀνασχόμενοι” of 12.138. Platt (J. P. xix. p. 48) suggests that the same phrase may indicate two different manœuvres. Here it might possibly imply throwing the shield back, so that the whole weight lay on the shoulders, as the Homeric warrior did when no attack was likely (8.94, 11.545). But this is not satisfactory.

[5] ὀλοίη for the usual “ὀλοή” only here, 1.342, Hymn. Ven. 224; cf. “ὀλώϊοςHes. Theog. 591, and “οὔλιος” (11.62) beside “οὖλος”.

[6] Ἰλίου, i.e.Ἰλίοο”, see on 21.104.

[7] Apollo is still in the guise of Agenor, 21.600.

[10] σὺ δέ, the opposition is only between the actions, not the subjects, of the two clauses, as 1.191, etc. The interposition of the subordinate “ὡς